My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:38 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:36:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/6/2002
Doc Name
Objections Concerning the Reclamation Permit Application Submitted by GCC Rio Grande, Inc.
From
Law Offices of Debra Eiland
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:. t <br />31 North Tejon Street ; <br />Suite 300 <br />Colorado Springs, CO 8ogo3 <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />MAY v 6 2002 <br />Division of Minerals and Geoloroy <br />Fax (719) 471-6922- <br />email. edebra@qmst.net <br />May 2, 2002 <br />via Facsimil <br />Jv <br />?oat <br />ivir. Tony walctronn AA ?p <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology ?Q (.t/1U?- <br />Department of Natural Resources ? ???- ?? ? ? j? . <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 ?'p" <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 U <br />re: Objections Concerning the Reclamation Pert <br />Grande, Inc. <br />Dear Mr. Waldron: <br />I represent Citizens for Clean Air & Water in Pueblo and Southern Colorado ("CCAP" ), <br />and am writing to forward the objections raised by CCAP's members concerning the <br />Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application that GCC Rio Grande, Inc. ("Rio <br />Grande") submitted to the Division for its planned limestone mining operation in Pueblo County. <br />CCAP's members have a number of serious concerns about the adequacy of Rio Grande's permit <br />application. As described below, Rio Grande has failed to demonstrate that it's proposed <br />reclamation activities will meet the requirements of the Mineral Rules and Regulations for the <br />Extraction of Construction Materials. <br />Reclamation Plan <br />Rio Grande's Reclamation Plan and Map are both very generalized documents that do not <br />demonstrate, or in many cases even address, how Rio Grande will meet the Reclamation <br />Performance Standards of Construction Materials Rule 3. Objectionable categories include: <br />revegetation, topsoiling, surface and ground water, and wildlife. <br />1. Reve etg ation <br />Construction Materials Rule 3.1.10 requires the Operator to revegetate the land to <br />establish a diverse, effective, and long-lasting vegetative cover capable of self-regeneration <br />without continued dependence on irrigation, soil amendments, or fertilizer. To reach that end, <br />Law (ices of Debra Eifand <br />(719) 471-1545
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.