Laserfiche WebLink
uq-81_008 <br />October 12, 2010 <br />David Berry <br />Director, Coal Regulatory Program <br />Western Fuels-Colorado Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />P.O. Box 628 1313 Sherman St. Room 215 <br />Nucla, Colorado 81424 Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />CEIVED <br />QGT 13 2010 <br />Division <br />I1a} of ke" f,8tion, <br />inn?g and Suety <br />Dear David: <br />Telephone 970/864-2165 <br />Fax 970/864-2168 Western Fuels-Colorado, LLC ("WFC") is in receipt of a Ten-Day Notice of <br />Violation, triggered by a citizen complaint (the "Complaint") filed by JoEllen <br />Turner, that the Office of Surface Mining ("OSM") forwarded to the Division. <br />The TDN addresses WFC's suspension of royalty payments to the Morgan family <br />in response to the family's continuing and repeated breaches of the September 10, <br />1998 Coal Mining Lease between WFC and Frank and Mary Lou Morgan (the <br />"Lease," attached hereto as Exhibit 1). WFC greatly appreciates the opportunity <br />to provide the Division and OSM with additional information as set forth below in <br />this letter. <br />WFC reviewed the Complaint that triggered the TDN and found it filled with the <br />usual invective and personal attacks that characterize JoEllen Turner's <br />correspondence. In addition, the Complaint addressed an issue not raised in the <br />TDN, specifically the issue of whether the Morgan family may continue farming <br />activities on their property during active mining. Because this issue was not raised <br />in the TDN, WFC assumes that it is not of interest to the Division at this time. <br />However, solely to clarify the record, WFC provides the Division with the <br />attached notice to vacate that was sent to the Morgans in 2008 pursuant to <br />paragraph 3(f) of the Lease (letter attached hereto as Exhibit 2). Since the date of <br />the notice to vacate, WFC has allowed the Morgans to farm on the property <br />pursuant to a verbal agreement that allowed them to continue their activities as <br />long as they did not interfere with mining activities. The particular dispute <br />referenced in the Complaint had to do with whether the Morgans' irrigation <br />activities (after the harvest of the last hay crop of the year) on the land that was <br />slated for topsoil removal in the near future was permissible under that verbal <br />agreement. It was not, and the Morgans agreed to discontinue their irrigation <br />activities. Contrary to the impression created by the Complaint, the conversation <br />between WFC`s counsel, JoEllen Turner, and Mike Morgan was civil, polite, and <br />resulted in immediate resolution of that particular issue. See, letter from counsel <br />dated October 4, 2010, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. <br />Turning to the issue that was raised in the TDN, WFC considers this to be a private <br />dispute between WFC and the Morgan family concerning the rights and