My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-11_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2010-06-11_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:13:01 PM
Creation date
6/15/2010 8:51:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/11/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Twentymile Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR73
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (33.03) 866-3Q567 <br />FJuneOli8301U6 <br />Mr. Jerry Nettleton <br />Twentymile Coal Company, LLC <br />29515 Routt County Road #27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />RE: Foidel Creek Mine (Permit No. C-82-056) <br />Technical Revision No. 73 (TR-73), Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Nettleton, <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />James B. Martin <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />The Division received Twentymile Coal Company's (TCC's) application for a technical revision (TR- <br />73) on May 25, 2010. The application was determined to be complete on June 3, 2010. No concerns <br />have been received from other agencies regarding this proposed technical revision. The Colorado <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has completed its adequacy review of the proposed <br />technical revision. Please respond to the following comments or concerns as necessary: <br />1. Appendix A, revised page TRIO-73, does not include the reclamation costs for the entire <br />proposed disturbance. Revised page 2.05-50.9 proposes to backfill and grade the trench <br />incrementally as the pipeline is installed, reclamation costs must be included for the entire <br />length of the disturbance. <br />Please include costs for backfilling and grading, and topsoil replacement for the entire 7.5 acres <br />of disturbance. <br />2. Current approved permit page 2.04-9 does not include discussion concerning the presence of <br />cultural and historic resources and no revised page 2.04-9 was included with the TR-73 <br />submittal. <br />Please indicate if the area of disturbance does not affect cultural and historic resources or if a <br />cultural and historic resources survey has been conducted of the proposed disturbance area. <br />3. Current approved Map 29, Reclamation Map, does not include the disturbance proposed in TR- <br />73. Please provide a revised Map 29 to reflect the proposed reclamation associated with <br />activities proposed in TR-73. <br />Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (303) 866-3567 ext 8134. <br />Since ely, ,, <br />ason M s' <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.