My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-26_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2010-03-26_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:02:43 PM
Creation date
3/29/2010 10:32:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/26/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Comment Responses
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR120
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MCOAL <br />NYL.L.C. <br />A Subsidiary of Arch Westem Bituminous Group, LLC <br />March 23, 2010 <br />Mr. Tom Kaldenbach <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />West Elk Mine <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />5174 Highway 133 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />(970) 929-2200 <br />Fax (970) 929-5050 <br />MAR 2 8-2010 <br />Diviien of Rte 4m* A; <br />MWft and SO* <br />Re: Mountain Coal Company, LLC, West Elk Mine; Permit No. C-1980-007; Technical <br />Revision No. 120, Refuse Pile Expansion East, Adequacy Comment Responses <br />Dear Mr. Kaldenbach: <br />Mountain Coal Company (MCC) submits the following responses to comments and questions <br />contained in your February 10th and March 11th comment letters. Responses are numbered in <br />the same order as the comments contained in these letters. <br />1. Per the February 22nd e-mail from Ms. Shina duVall, the SHPO has no further concerns. <br />2. Maps 53C and 54C have been expanded to cover the entire area of the disturbance <br />proposed in TR-120. See the revised maps attached. <br />3. Map 54C has been revised to reflect the drainage designs shown on drawing C-13 and <br />uses the standard symbols and line weights shown on MCC's other drainage maps. <br />4. No, the clear water ditches will not be directed to the sediment pond. As shown on <br />drawing C-13 and Map 54C, the clear water flows will be directed away from the pile by <br />diverting flows from the pile perimeter to the natural drainages below, to the west (along <br />the RPE East haul roads), as well as to the east. <br />5-12. Seethe attached March 19, 2010 responses from Ban- Engineering <br />13. MCC has revised paragraphs 9 and 10 on age 2.05-47 to refer to "permanent refuse <br />disposal areas", rather than each area individually. <br />14-22. See the responses e-mailed to Ms. Talvitie and you on March 9?' and the attached <br />March 19, 2010 responses from Barr Engineering. <br />Please feel free to contact me should you have further comments or questions regarding this <br />submittal. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kathleen G. Welt <br />Environmental Engineer I I I <br />cc: Doug Nolte -MCC
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.