My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-21_REVISION - C1996083 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-02-21_REVISION - C1996083 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:06 PM
Creation date
2/18/2010 10:30:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/21/2008
Doc Name
Responses to Questions Regarding Chemical Analysis (Memo)
From
Jim Stark
To
Joe Dudash
Type & Sequence
TR51
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF. COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />E <br />COLORADO <br />D I V IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />INTEROFFICE <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Joe Dudash <br />FROM: Jim Stark <br />SUBJECT: Bowie No. 2 Mine's TR-51 <br />Bowie Responses to Questions Regarding Chemical Analysis <br />DATE: 21 February 2008 <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />I have reviewed BRL's 18 February 2008 responses to my original memo dated 15 <br />February 2008. Below are my responses to the BRL letter with some comments, as <br />appropriate. <br />A. Response Accepted. Generally, picking up small pieces of material (rock) <br />would not be an acceptable method of sample collection due to weathering <br />and other impurity considerations. In this case, however, these small pieces <br />are from rock that has just been excavated and weathering at the surface can <br />be assumed to be negligible. It can be reasonably assumed that these small <br />pieces of sandstone are from the larger sandstone unit. Therefore, the sample <br />BRL sent to the lab can be deemed adequate for the Division's purposes. <br />B. Response Accepted. Based on the information in the laboratory reports <br />provided by BRL, the sample was prepared and analyzed in accordance with <br />standard, accepted EPA procedures. Additionally, the sample was analyzed <br />well within the holding time limits. <br />C. Response Accepted. See response to B above. <br />D. Response Accepted Based on the information in the laboratory reports <br />provided by BRL, all of the constituents that were given a "U" designation <br />(for below detection limit) had both MDL's (method detection limits) and <br />PQL's (practical quantitation limit) that were lower than the suspect levels for <br />those constituents. This means that if any of these constituents were present, <br />the instrument would have detected them at a sufficiently low level to alert the <br />Division of a potential problem. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.