Laserfiche WebLink
United States Department of the Interior <br />IN REPLY REFER. <br />ES/CO:OSM <br />TAILS 65413-2007-F-0054 <br />FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE <br />Ecological Services <br />764 Horizon Drive, Building B <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506-3946 <br />April 13, 2007 <br />Memorandum <br />i <br />4 <br />To: Natural Resource Specialist, Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and <br />Enforcement, Denver, Colorado <br />From: Western Colorado Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, Grand <br />Junction, Colorado j <br />Subject: Comments on the Biological Assessm nt for Bowie Resources LTD "Bowie No. 2" <br />Mine, Permit C-96-083, Technical Revision 45 <br />This is in response to your letter dated November 20, 2006, regarding Technical Revision 45 for <br />the Bowie Resources LTD "Bowie No. 2" Mine, Permit C-96-083. The Bowie No. 2 Mine is an <br />underground coal operation in Delta County, Colorado, approximately 5 miles northeast of the <br />town of Paonia, on private property and lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management. <br />The proposed action is construction of a new 600,000 to 700,000 ton permanent coal refuse <br />disposal site, topsoil stockpile, soil cover stockpile, and drainage controls on a 45-acre site, <br />which is currently under cultivation in irrigated hay and orchard crops. An existing pond (Pond <br />J) will be deepened to capture the runoff from the site; since the surface area of Pond J is to be <br />reduced from 0.63 to 0.28 acres, the estimated evaporative loss will decrease by 0.227 acre-feet. <br />The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides these comments under the authority of, <br />and in accordance with, the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as <br />amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the Interagency Cooperation Regulations (50 CFR 402). <br />Your letter includes effects determinations for the bald eagle, Canada lynx, black-footed ferret, <br />Uinta basin hookless cactus, clay-loving wild buckwheat, and the yellow-billed cuckoo. Your <br />analysis found that no suitable habitat exists in the project area for the Canada lynx, black-footed <br />ferret, Uinta basin hookless cactus, clay-loving wild buckwheat, or yellow-billed cuckoo. Given <br />this information, you arrived at "no effect" findings for these species. Because the Office of <br />Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) determined that the proposed action <br />would not affect the Canada lynx, black-footed ferret, Uinta basin hookless cactus, clay-loving <br />wild buckwheat, or the yellow-billed cuckoo, consultation and concurrence are not necessary on <br />these species. <br />Regarding the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker, and bonytail, the <br />Service's view is that any water depletions from the Upper Colorado River Basin are considered <br />-rf1_,_- I/ <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 2 3 2007 <br />?F '' Divis-:--r; o Reclamation, <br />?a? iviining and Safety