My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-22_REVISION - C1996083 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-09-22_REVISION - C1996083 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:31 PM
Creation date
9/23/2008 11:25:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/22/2008
Doc Name
Review Memo
From
Mike Boulay
To
Joe Dudash
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Joe Dudash <br />FROM: Mike Boulay MF <br />DATE: September 22, 2008 <br />SUBJECT: Bowie No. 2 Mine Permit No. C-1996-083 <br />Permit Revision No. 10 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />As requested, I have reviewed Bowie Resources, LLC's (BRL's) response to Item 2 of our adequacy <br />review for PR-10 regarding groundwater monitoring including points of compliance. Specifically I <br />have reviewed the recent responses submitted by J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc. dated September 5, <br />2008 and the report prepared by HydroGeo, Inc. for the B-Seam and strata above B-Seam water <br />quality analysis. I have the following comments. <br />2A. The operator states that they opted to use existing groundwater baseline data rather than <br />gather new baseline data and that the HydroGeo report predicts down gradient water quality. <br />The expected ranges (Tables 3 and 4 in the Conclusions of the report) are based on previous <br />data from existing wells. There was no modeling performed and the predictions were based <br />solely on ranges of known values for pH, total dissolved solids, total Iron and total <br />Manganese. The report further states that the "water quality data from these wells is limited <br />to only a few samples; therefore, any detailed statistical analysis of the data or assessment of <br />seasonal trends is not possible." <br />There is a high variability in water quality seen in the area monitoring wells which may be <br />due to the heterogeneous nature of the Mesa Verde Formation. The report further suggests <br />that high pH and TDS values may be due to poor well construction or well casing failure <br />resulting in contamination from cement or bentonite grout. <br />I reviewed the State Engineers Office data base for wells within the permit boundary and <br />adjacent down gradient areas. My cursory review showed 23 well permits most of which <br />were for monitoring wells associated with the mining operation. There were two permits <br />with only very limited information, one was a domestic stock water well with no well log <br />information and one was for a well drilled in 1965 that was only 35 feet deep. My <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.