My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP51172
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP51172
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:58 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:01:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2004
Doc Name
2002 AHR & ARR Adequacy Response
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES <br />2768 COMPASS DRIVE, SUITE 101 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (970) 245-4101, FAX 242-7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />March 25, 2004 <br />Mr. J. J. Dudash <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Bowie No. 1 Mine, Bowie Resources Limited <br />2002 Annual Report <br />Adequacy Response <br />Permit No. C-81-038 <br />Dear Mr. Dudash: <br />MAR <br /> <br />o;~;s;o„ 2 9 ?0~4 <br />oly;~e~als g fool <br />~Y <br />The DMG's letter dated Februazy 17, 2004 transmitted its adequacy comments regazding the 2002 <br />Annual Report. Following are Bowie's responses to the DMG's comments and concerns: <br />2002 Annual HydroloQV Report (AHR) <br />1. There are several wells that do not appear to have the required full suite <br />analyses. For instance, according to Table 1 of the 2002 AHR, the SM series of <br />wells are required to have semi-annual full suite analyses. However, the 2002 <br />AHR data sheets show that only au annual full suite analysis was run. Also, <br />according to Table 1, wells MW-1 and MW-3 require quarterly full suite <br />analyses. However, MW-1 has no fourth quarter and MW-3 has no first and <br />fourth quarter analyses. Please explain. If the reason is that there was not <br />enough water for such analyses, please state that in the field comments for each <br />sampling event <br />BRL -All of the aforementioned monitoring sites, with the exception of MW-3, <br />were sampled and analyzed during December, 2002. Unfortunately, the lab reports <br />for these sites were not forwazded to this office for reporting. There was not <br />enough water in the 1~` and 4`s quarters of 2002 at the MW-3 site to send in for <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />RE~F~~~o <br />analysis. Enclosed are corrected Monitoring Tables for these sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.