My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-01-03_REPORT - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2003-01-03_REPORT - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 2:51:29 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:47:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/3/2003
Doc Name
Annual Reclamation Reports memo
From
Byron Walker
To
Janet Binns
Annual Report Year
2000
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO: RYRON WAL' 3R <br />PROM: )ANP,T RiNNS./ <br />SUBJECT: IiEENPSB RG 2000 \ UN, RI';CIJ\1G\'1'ION 121:?PORTS <br />DATE: 01 j03j03 <br />CC: DAN IIERNANDF.'/. <br />Coors Enugy Company submitted the 2000 ARR on Mazch 8, 2001. The Keenesburg Mine permit commits to <br />submittal of the Annual Reclamation Report by The end of February each year. Preupitaion was well below average <br />during 2000. <br />Vegetative success is based on comparison with approved reference area; Osgood Reference area. Cover success is <br />based on total vegetative cover, which includes woody plant cover. Production is based on herbaceous vegetative <br />cover. Species composition is based on relative cover of the individual plant species compared to a composition <br />standard. There is no woody stem density requirement for the Keenesburg Mine reclamation success standard. <br />In 2000, total cover measured in the Osgood reference area was 35.8°fo. CEC measured total vegetative cover in the <br />1995 Reclaimed azea at 25.82%, 1997 Reclaimed azea at 22.8%, and the 1998 reseeded/interseeded azea at 43.6%. <br />Based on this data, only the 1998 reseeded azea would meet the cover standard. However, the data represents the Soh <br />and 3~ growing seasons for the 1995 Reclaimed area and 1997 Reclaimed area respectively. Continued monitoring <br />should reflect a gradual increase in cover as the reclaimed areas progress in the liability period. <br />Herbaceous productivity measured in the Osgood reference area in 2000 was 57.44 gxamsJM2 (512 Ib/acre). <br />Herbaceous productivity measured on the 1995 Reclaimed, 1997 Reclaimed, and 1988 Reseeded areas was 93.65 <br />grams/MZ (835 ]b/acre), 87.89 grams/Mz (783 Ib/acre), and 104.4 grams/Mz (930 Ib/acre) respectively. All three <br />measured reclaimed areas would meet the herbaceous productivity standard. <br />Species composition would not be met for any of the measured aeeas, not even the Osgood reference area would <br />meet the requited vegetation diversity standard found in the permit. The diversity standard calls for 7 perennial non- <br />noxious species with greater than 3% relative importance but less than 40% relative importance. Of these 7 species, 4 <br />should be warm season grasses and one shall be a foxb. The 2000 Annual Reclamation Report indicates that the <br />operator thinks that the diversity standard should be revised, but no revision of this nature has been submitted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.