My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48765
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48765
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:52:33 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:24:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/29/1988
Doc Name
1986 AHR Review letter
From
MLRD
To
ENERGY FUELS COAL INC
Annual Report Year
1986
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~- ti <br />_L~ <br />~..: <br />STATE OF COLORP~14~Illllllllllu <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />M{NED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlrsctor <br />September 29, 1968 <br />Mr. Allen 5. Weaver <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Southfield t•line <br />P.O. Box 449 <br />Florence, Colorado 81226 <br />RE: Southfield Mine (C-81-014) 1986-87 Annual Hydrologic Report <br />Dear Ftr. Weaver: <br />I have completed a review of the 1986-87 Annual Hydrologic Report furnished me <br />April 20, 1988 and I have the following comments: <br />The report satisfies the requirments of Stipulation 6 and the <br />hydrologic monitoring commitment approved in Stipulation 2 of the <br />permit; <br />This report might better be scheduled for delivery August 1 instead <br />of July 1 so that the quarterly monitoring could be done on the <br />basis of a calendar year rather than the "unique" system currently <br />in use. (We discussed this during my last complete inspection. A <br />minor revision to the permit would probably be all that would be <br />required). <br />The discussions of water inflow and of water balance and <br />consumptive use should incorporate and consider the contribution of <br />the Corley well to the supply of water imported for the mine. This <br />well appears from Figure 2 to be utilized to supply the mine, it is <br />metered; and there appear to be 19 or so acre feet consumed by the <br />mine for v+hich no source is noted. <br />The validity of statements made in Part II under Ground Water, e. g. <br />"...data indicates no significant changes in ground water levels as <br />a result of mining" cannot be confirmed from the water level plots <br />presented. The data are limited and do not allow comparison of <br />current levels with those of the past. The previous data from the <br />wells should be provided and/or plotted with the current data so <br />that any trends are recognizable or their absence readily <br />verifiable. <br />Tne water quality data for the monitoring wells are similarly <br />limited. The significance of current water quality and any <br />variation in quality during the current monitoring year cannot be <br />determined when only the most recent data are presented. Past <br />quality data for these wells should be included for comparison. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.