My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48657
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48657
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:52:27 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:22:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/21/1994
Doc Name
1992 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS II LETTER
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CO
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1992
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•- <br />C crpRUs <br />'•~ Yampavauey <br />~~~ I~~II~!I~II~~~~~ <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Coal Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road #27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303-879-3800 <br />January 18, 1994 <br />Kent Gorham <br />Environmental Protection <br />Division of Minerals and <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Gorham; <br />Specialist <br />Geology <br />215 <br />RECF1VEp <br />JAN 21 ]994 <br />CIl7aOn C1 P; I:fk~~2i~ a (~b~h.;,: <br />Enclosed, please find materials which should complete the <br />information packet previously submitted with the initial responses <br />to the referenced AHR review. These items address points noted in <br />your letter dated 10 December, and hopefully will serve to complete <br />/ clarify those items. Each Division concern is re-stated, and is <br />followed immediately by TCC's response. <br />DMG Concern <br />1. Site 1003 elevation is still incorrect on either the data sheet <br />or the station/elevation table at the beginning of the data <br />section. Please correct as necessary. <br />TCC Response <br />Upon review, it would appear that the elevation values for both of <br />the referenced pages are the same, and are in fact correct. <br />However, further review revealed that the update of Table 1 did not <br />include the correction of the 1003 elevation value. A copy of the <br />pertinent Table 1 revised page is enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />2. Site 8 depth and flow readings reveal the following: <br />-1.62 depth 6.7 cfs <br />-1.02 depth 0.6 cfs <br />-3.75 depth 0.6 cfs <br />Different depths are shown as being converted to the same <br />discharge. Please correct this information and Table 30. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.