My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48288
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:52:11 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/10/1992
From
IMS INC
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiuiiiiii <br />~~~ 0~~ <br />enrirornneeml scientists mrA eagieeers <br />50 South Steele Street, Suite 720 <br />Denver, Colorado 80209 <br />voice (303) 393-6701 <br />fax (303)393-6704 <br />August 31, 1992 <br />Susan Morrison <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Deaz Susan: <br />RECEIVE ~~ <br />SEP 101992 <br />DIVISiUt~~ Ur <br />MINERALS ~: ~iEOLi)%v <br />This letter accompanies two copies of our report of the 1992 vegetation monitoring <br />at Sun Coal Company's Meadows No. 1 mine near Hayden, Colorado. <br />As you will see from the report, the proposed sagebrush/grass reference area <br />which has been proposed in the latest application for technical revision was <br />sampled this year in lieu of the mountain shrub reference area at the Seneca II <br />mine. This reflects Sun Coal's intention of going for bond release at this time only <br />for the major portion of the reclaimed area which is owned by Grassy Creek Coal <br />Co., using the sagebrush/grassceference area which was the subject of the <br />previous Technical Revision No. 12. We do not believe we can achieve shrub <br />densities on the Eilts property in the neaz term which would allow going for bond <br />release at this time. For this reason, woody plant density was not sampled on the <br />Eilts property this year. <br />Also enclosed are two copies of revised permit application pages (pp. 333, 334, <br />335, and 381) which reflect changes necessitated by the adoption of Technical <br />Revision 12 and your subsequent response letter dated July 27, 1992. The revised <br />pages specify that the sagebtush/grass reference area would be used as a standard <br />for comparison with the Grassy Creek Coal Co. property only, and that the Seneca <br />II reference area would remain as a comparative standard for reclaimed land owned <br />by Mr. Eilts. I have also changed the level of statistical confidence required for <br />determining revegetation success from 80 percent to 90 percent and the description <br />of the method for sampling herbaceous production as using a 0.5-meter squaze <br />quadrat which is in keeping with the method which we have been using for the past <br />several years at this mine. <br />The revised pages clearly show all additions [in italics] and all deletions [itt-stfike- <br />tln3t]. Upon your review of these permit application revisions, I will produce these <br />revised pages incorporating the approved changes in final form. I will also send <br />you a map and more precise description of the location of the sagebrush/grass <br />reference area in the next couple of weeks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.