My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP47979
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP47979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:51:47 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:11:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/24/1989
Doc Name
1988 ARR Review Letter
From
MLRD
To
KERR COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />STATE, OF COLOlZ~1~U <br />+\~~~;:~ Roy Romer, Governor ~~ <br />/P'!6 ~ _ <br />r <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ~ ~~ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION j;';~•~~ <br />~~2 <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlractor ~ ~. ~~ <br />July 24, 1989 <br />14r. David Gossett <br />Kerr Coal Company <br />C/0 ACZ Engineering and Analytical Services <br />1475 Pine Grove Road <br />P.O. Box 774018 <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 <br />RE: Kerr Coal Company 1988 Annual Reclamation Report, C-80-006 <br />Dear Mr. Gossett: <br />The Division has reviewed the 1988 Annual Reclamation Report submitted <br />June 9, 1989. Comments under the heading of "I. General Review of Appendix A" <br />involve adeD.uacy concerns relating to the Annual Report. Comments under the <br />heading "II. Re viev+ of Kerr Recommendations to the Reclamation Plan" should be <br />considered Drior to submittal of a revised reclamation plan. <br />General Review of Appendix A <br />In the first section of Appendix A, the authors address trends in cover, <br />production, woody plant Density, species diversity, and the potential <br />dominance of Darticular introduced species, over the three sampling periods <br />(1984, 1986 and 1988)• They also consider whether revegetation success is <br />being achieved. The conclusions reached are that diversity standards and <br />production requirements have probably been met in all reclaimed areas. Cover <br />is expected to be met if herbaceous layer rather than total plant cover <br />comparisons are made between reference and reclaimed areas. However, <br />reference areas were not sampled for comparison, and woody plant density is <br />not close to the standard of 2,000 stems/acre on any site. <br />This section is acceptable with the foliow.ino exceptions. The authors often <br />casually explain negative trends since 1986 as being a function of 1988 being <br />a dry year (which is not proven) or of 1988 samDlinD not being intensive <br />enough to be a valid sample of the population. These are both weak arguments <br />considering that otner possible explanations were not explored or ruled out. <br />Furthermore, accordi,nD to the hlay, June, and July 1988 issues of "Colorado <br />Climate", May, 1988, precipitation at Walden was 163.6x, June was 72.~~, and <br />July was 106.5° of the normal amount o` precipitation that is typically <br />expected for each of those months. This data indicates that the early summer <br />of 1988 before the July 21 and 22 vegetation samplinD was not an exceptionally <br />dry year. "Colorado Climate" does indicate that the 1988 water year <br />precipitation average was lower than the 1986 water year average in Walden <br />(127q vs. 151b of the 1961-1980 average, respectively) but that precipitation <br />in 1988 was considerably above average. The issue of sampling intensity is <br />addressed in Section I.B. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Sireet Denver, Colorado 80203.2273 Tel. (303) 8663567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.