My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40724
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:37:04 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/30/1989
Doc Name
LOWER WASTE PILE COMPACTION & STABILITY REPORT internal memo
From
J. Pendleton
To
MATT HAYES
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />Date: January 30, 1989 <br />To: Matt Hayes <br />From: Jim Pendleton ~ _ ~-u-.~i~ <br />Re: Mt. Gunnis o. 1 over Waste Pile -Compaction b Stability Report <br />(Permit #C-80-007) <br />I have reviewed the letter report submitted by West Elk Coal Company for the <br />required quarterly monitoring of compaction and facial slope stability of its <br />lower waste pile at the Mt. Gunnison Mo. 1 underground coal mine. The <br />compaction monitoring report documents that a portion of the latest lift of <br />material placed on the pile was determined to be insufficiently compacted when <br />tested on October 10tH. This portion of the upper lift was subsequently <br />recompacted and retested the following day. The October 11th tests determined <br />the upper lift to be in compliance. This is exactly how the inspection <br />testing process is intended to function. <br />Upon my review of last quarter's compaction results, I forwarded a memorandum <br />to your attention which questioned the Proctor compaction standard being used <br />by West Elk Coal Company. This quarter's report did not address my earlier <br />inquiry. If you have received a separate response to my concern, please <br />forward it for my review. If the company has not responded, I recommend that <br />you request a clarification of their Proctor standard selection. <br />The pile's facial stability monitoring survey data continues to demonstrate <br />that the monuments installed on the pile's facial slope have not undergone any <br />significant movement. Based upon this report, the pile appears to be stab]e <br />and properly compacted. <br />cc: Sue Mowry <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866.3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.