REP33564

• Permit No: C1984063
• IBM Index Class Name: Report
• Doc Date: 2/19/2002
• Doc Name: 2001 AHR Review Memo
• From: Byron Walker
• To: File
• Annual Report Year: 2001
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman SI., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
to: File C-84-063 Eastside Mine
from: Byron G. Walker .f~~
subject: Review for Compliance, 2001 Annual Hydrology Report
date: February 19, 2002
D f V! s f O N O F
MINERALS
GEOLOGY
RECLAMATION
MI NING•SAFETY
Bill Owens
Governor
Greg E. Watcher
Executive Director
Michael B. Long
Division Director
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c): A hydrologic report shat! be submitted to the Division annually with the date
ofsubmittal determined in consultation with the permittee. The annual hydrologic report shall
contain at a minimum:
The report is in compliance with [his rule. The submittal date is "by the end of the following
February" (PAP page 59). The report, dated February 2002, was received in the Division of Minerals
and Geology (Division) on February 14, 2002 under a Stephen Self letter of February 6,2002.
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(i): Water quantity data obtained from each monitoring site during the water
year;
Water quantity data was submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year. The requirement is
calendar year (PAP page 59). There was no discharges from the sedimentation pond (Report Page
3). The introduction section of the report does not identify the discharge point of the sedimentation
pond as a monitoring point, but it is described in the following description of water monitoring
section.
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(ii): Water quality data obtained from each monitoring site during the water year;
and
The report is in compliance with this rule with the exception that water quality data was submitted
by calendar year in-lieu-of water year (PAP page 59).
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(iii): If required by the Division, a written interpretation of the data and
identification of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance.
The report is incompliance with this rule. The Division required no written interpretation of the data,
but a summary of impacts is provided in the report. Impacts are reported as within the probable
hydraulic consequences as presented in the Permit (Report Page 5). The prediction was that there
would be no water quality impact (Permit, page 63).