Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE <br />OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmeni of Nalu ral Resources <br />l i l t Sherman 51., Room 21 5 q <br /> <br />Denver, ColoraAo BOLUS Il <br />~~ <br /> <br />f hone' 13071 866-3567 I <br />FA>( (303) 8128106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OI <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCE` <br />DATE: March 3, 1994 Rny Rn^rer <br /> Go~erno~ <br />T0: Susan Burgmaier he^sai.,,.,r <br />yJ.~ E.ecw ne Duen o~ <br />~ <br />~~ / 1 ~~ <br />FROM: Kent Gorham Mi[ hael B. Loral; <br /> Drviainn Dueonr <br />RE: Edna PHC Review, TDS Loading to Trout Creek, C-80-001 <br /> <br />I have completed review of Appendix 2.5-A submitted by P&M for the Edna Mine. <br />My comments are as follows: <br />The operator characterizes the quality. of water in Trout Creek at TR-A <br />for the years 1980 and 1989-1993. It should be noted that the average <br />value for total dissolved solids (TDS) varied slightly from 1980 to <br />present (156mg/1 to 130mg/1). It is interesting to note that the maximum <br />value for TDS always occurs in April and May and the lowest value occurs <br />in June or July. This phenomenon exists because the runoff and <br />infiltration at the mine and its associated springs peaks during April <br />and May, at which time the flow in Trout Creek is still well below its <br />peak which occurs during June and July. It is also interesting to note <br />that observed low values for TDS for the period 1980 to present were <br />identical, 62mg/l. This low value confirms the source of the water as <br />snowmelt from higher elevations which has very little contact with the <br />type of rocks or soils which allow the water to pick up additional <br />dissolved solids. From inspection of the data it is apparent that few if <br />any activities above the mine have impacted Trout Creek TDS. It is my <br />opinion that the data at this key site is representative and its <br />integrity should be maintained through field inspection monitoring and <br />verification of sampling protocol. <br />In 1980 the average TDS at the downstream site TR-D was 280mg/l, an <br />increase of 124mg/1 over the upstream site TR-A. Presently, TR-D TDS <br />averages 498mg/l, an increase over the upstream site of 368 mg/1. This <br />data indicates a trend of gradual degradation of water quality relative <br />to upstream quality. The operator uses past flow and quality data from <br />known sources in calculations to deduce flow and quality from "other" <br />sources. These other sources are defined as: <br />Irrigation flow diverted above TR-A and returned above TR-B <br />Surface runoff from the mine <br />Watersheds from the west side of Trout Creek <br />East Ridge and Center Ridge groundwater <br />Groundwater from the west side of Trout Creek <br />