My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP19805
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP19805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:48:26 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:44:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/20/1997
Doc Name
1995 ANNUAL REPORT REVIEW APEX 2 MINE PN C-81-011 SUNLAND MINING CORP
From
DMG
To
GREG LEWICKI AND ASSOCIATES
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ 999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Rewurces II~~~ <br />1313 Sherman Sl., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FA%.1303) 832-8106 <br />naPA»ntErrr or <br />February 20, 1997 ~,S UR <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />Mr. Greg Lewicki Ezecmive Director <br />Greg Lewicki and Associates Michael B. Long <br />1645 Court Place, Suite 309 Division DirMOr <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />RE: 1995 Annual Report Review, Apex No. 2 Mine, Permit No. C-81- <br />011, Sunland Mining Corporation <br />Dear Mr. Lewicki: <br />The Division has completed its review of the 1995 Annual Report and <br />has the following questions or comments: <br />1. The Division finds the 1995 Annual Reclamation Report to be <br />acceptable, <br />2. The surface water and groundwater data contained in the 1995 <br />Annual Hydrologic Report shows no abnormalities with previous <br />monitoring data, and no water quality compliance limitations <br />were exceeded, <br />3. The surface water and groundwater monitoring results support <br />the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of the permit <br />application, <br />4. Although the downgradient groundwater well, Edna's well TR- <br />1.5, showed a higher specific conductance than that in the <br />Apex upgradient groundwater site, the difference is probably <br />because of Edna mine site influences rather than Apex minesite <br />influences. Apex has agreed to drill a downgradient <br />groundwater well closer to the Apex minesite, so that the Edna <br />well TR-1.5 would no longer be used by Apex for monitoring. <br />5. Apex has agreed to reopen the upstream alluvial well for <br />groundwater monitoring. <br />6. On future pond inspection reports, please provide a P.E. stamp <br />on the submittal. <br />7. As a reminder, the pond inspection reports need to be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.