My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP03669
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP03669
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:34:35 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/26/1988
Doc Name
RECLAMATION OF THE THOMPSON 2 COAL MINE AT THE SNOWMASS COAL MINE SITE
From
MLRD
To
DENNIS BURNS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~ • III III III III IIII III <br />~~~°~ F STRTE OF~OLORf~DU <br />u <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />~~~ . ~ c-' <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlnetor <br />DATE: May 26. 1988 <br />T0: Dennis Burns, Albuquerque Field Dffice <br />FROM: David Holm, Inactive Mine Reclamation Supervisor <br />RE: Reclamation of the Thompson No. 2 Coal Mine at the Snowmass Coal Mine <br />site <br />As you know the Inactive Mine Reclamation Program designed and constructed a <br />passive mine drainage treatment system at the abandoned Thompson No. 2 Coal <br />Mine located near Carbondale, Colorado. The Thompson No. 2 PMDT system was <br />constructed early in 1985. Prior to any work at the site, the Inactive Mine <br />Program received approval from the Colorado Water Quality Control Division <br />(WQCD) to construct the Thompson PMDT system as amine drainage abatement <br />feasibilty study. Potential requirements for a IJPDES permit were waived by <br />• the WQCD. Also, negotiations between Colorado's Title V and Title IV <br />reclamation programs and officials at the Snowmass Mining Co. occurred in <br />which it was decided that the AML project area should be removed from the <br />permitted area of the Snowmass Mine. Accordingly, the Inactive (Nine <br />Reclamation Program assumed reclamation responsibility for the disturbances <br />created by the passive mine drainage treatment project. <br />The passive mine drainage system incorporates three basic facilities. A <br />constructed iretland receives drainage from the abandoned Thompson No. 2 Mine <br />portal. The purpose of the constructed wetland is to remove heavy metals by <br />adsorption into the organic substrate of the constructed wetland and by plant <br />uptake. The mine drainage filters through this constructed wetl~snd and <br />discharges into a 4 inch diameter ABS plastic pipe which conveys the drainage <br />down a steep hill slope into a limestone filled channel. A series of drop <br />structures were created in the limestone filled channel in order to provide <br />aeration and to exsolve carbon dioxide from the mine drainage. 'this channel <br />conveys the drainage to Thompson Creek. <br />The- PMDT system constructed at the Thompson No. 2 Coal Mine has Keen extremely <br />valuable in elucidating the design and construction principles which are <br />useful in passive mine drainage system applications. This system was beset by <br />marry environmental and technical problems. Construction was aca~mplished <br />during harsh winter conditions. After completion this system experienced <br />minus 30°F operating temperatures and freezing of water in conve;iance pipes <br />was a problem. Unprecedented variations in flows discharged from the mine <br />. portal occurred during the first year of operation. During the 20 years of <br />observed flows from the mine preceeding construction of the trea trnent system <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.