Laserfiche WebLink
Review Checklist for Subsidence Monitoring Report <br />Mine; King Coal Date this review was completed: 3/24/05 <br />Permit No.: C-81-035 CDMG reviewer: Tom Kaldenbach <br />Report period: 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters 2004 <br />Monitoring requirement Regulation citation In complian~ e: <br />Yes / no . Comment <br />Installed and surveyed Only the Crawford residence <br />monuments prior to 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(A) Yes required monuments. Those <br />undermining. monuments were surveyed <br /> quarterly from Oct. 2001 until <br />Located monuments to April 2003 when DMG approved <br />detect vertical 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(B) Yes suspension of monitoring. The <br />subsidence and monuments are to remain in place <br />horizontal displacement. for possible future use (permit <br /> Section 2.05.6, pa e 4). <br /> Quarterly monitoring is required <br />Monitored each for only: surface cracks over <br />structure's orientation, 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(C) Yes abandoned workings, the <br />location, elevation. Huntington ditch, and the <br /> Crawford ditch. <br />Monitored each <br />monument and structure 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(D) Yes <br />at least uarterl . <br />Commenced monitoring <br />of each monument and <br />structure at least one 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(D) Yes <br />month prior to <br />undermining. <br /> <br />Submitted monitoring The second quarter report was <br /> <br />report at least <br />2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(E) <br />Yes submitted a few months late, but <br />semiannually. did not significantly hinder <br /> compliance verification. <br />Conducted sufficient <br />post-mining monitoring 2.05.6(6(c)(i))(F) Yes <br />to verify subsidence <br />prediction <br />Accurately predicted 2.05.6(6)(d)(i) Yes In compliance based on <br />subsidence. observations below. <br />There was no imminent <br />or actual material <br />damage or diminution of 2.05.6(6)(d)(i) Yes In compliance based on <br />use of renewable observations below. <br />resource lands or <br />structures <br />