My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP00647
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP00647
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:29:33 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:43:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/2/1994
Doc Name
1993 AHR comment letter
From
DMG
To
MINREC INC
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiiiiiiiiniu iii <br />~~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1 lU Sherman SL, Ruom 215 + <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80207 I <br />~ <br /> <br />Phone: (3031 8663567 I <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCE <br />September 2 <br />1994 <br />, Ro Romer <br />Y <br /> Governor <br />Mr. Jim Stover ken Salazar <br />Minrec, InC. Execun ve Dveaor <br />2768 Compass Drive, Suite 101 Mic hael B. Long <br />Grand Junction, CO 81506 °i~`~'°°~`recl°` <br />RE: 1993 Annual Hydrology Report; Hlue Ribbon Mine; <br />Permit No. C-81-047 <br />Dear Mr. Stover; <br />The Division has reviewed the Annual Hydrology Report (AHR) for <br />data collected during water year 1993. The comments will be <br />arranged in two sections. The first section will include a review <br />of the responses given to the Division's comments regarding the <br />1992 AHR, and the second section will focus on the 1993 AHR. <br />Section I: <br />1. The description of how Hydrologic monitoring is performed has <br />been included on page 3 of the AHR. The description <br />identifies the 9 foot diameter culvert as the location where <br />flow is measured. However, Exhibit P and Z identify a <br />monitoring location further upstream. It is marked as H-1 on <br />Exhibit P. A downstream station is also shown on Exhibit P. <br />Flow and quality measurements taken at the culvert would not <br />yield a sample representative of Hubbard Creek, as the mine <br />site could possibly impact the creek at this point. The <br />approved sampling locations as identified on Exhibit P and Z <br />should be adhered to when samples are collected. Page 3 <br />should be revised to state that flow and quality measurements <br />will be taken in the approved locations. <br />The last sentence of flow methods reads, "The flow from the <br />piezometers is determined by timing flow into a container of <br />known size". The Division believes you intend to measure flow <br />from the bench drains, rather than piezometers. <br />2. What is the one flow measurement taken for Hubbard Creek <br />trying to predict? It appears from the permit that mining was <br />originally intended to go below Hubbard Creek. It was <br />predicted that there would be an insignificant depletion since <br />the area to be mined below the Creek was approximately five <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.