Laserfiche WebLink
r ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ <br />999 <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Co. 80203-2273 <br />Ref: Objections to: United Companies of <br />[618 Dike Road, Gd <br />Application. <br />Gentlemen: <br />April 6, 1990 <br />,r -. <br />Mesa County, Y~nc'. <br />Jct, Co. 81502] <br />NPR 1 ~1~ ~/i~3'9[[;1 <br />~EIIVL~~ ~+.. •3~/ <br />n.a n.~.'"'nil r*n, <br />A public announcement was printed in the Grand Junction <br />Daily Sentinel begining March 8, then on the 15th, 22nd, and <br />March 29, 1990 stating the above listed firm had made <br />application with your Division for a gravel pit reclamation <br />permit for the Virginia Acres Pit located on 30 Road and the <br />Colorado River. <br />That announcement said in part "Written statements in <br />support or objection to the proposal must be filed with the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Hoard by 5 p.m. April 18, 1990." <br />We pry=_sent our objections. <br />lae object to the pit for several very important reasons <br />and while we recognize the Mesa County Commissioners did <br />appro•re the pit over the total objection of all residents <br />concerned, the County Commissioners ignored very serious <br />potential dangers to the nearby residents adjacent to the <br />pit even though it was called to their attention. We feel <br />that your office should review the reasons we feel the <br />application should be denied in the interest of public <br />safet;r and possible economic disaster for the adjacent <br />residents. <br />1. Nearby adjacent residents are not now on the immediate <br />flood plain of the Colorado River and none require expensive <br />flood plain insurance. <br />2. If' the pit is operated as progosed it will remove about <br />600-800 feet of the existing surface lands between the river <br />and the private properties. The gravel deposit is below the <br />Colorado River level and will result in a deep excavation. <br />After the gravel removal the pit area will be very subject <br />to becoming a part of the Colorado River channel the first <br />time tY+ere is a heavy run-off from deep snows in the Colorado <br />River Basin which periodically occur. [See Exhibit No. 1] <br />L+ata obtained from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and <br />the U.S. Soil Conservation Service reveals that in 1983 the <br />Colorado River channel moved 1400 feet north of its course <br />at that time, immediately to the area west of the proposed <br />pit. [See drawing attached as Exhibit no. 2.] <br />