PERMFILE108943

• Permit No: M2004051
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 10/21/2004
• Doc Name: Additional Adequacy Review Comments/Clarifications
• From: DMG
• To: Applegate Group Inc.
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
October 21, 2004
Mr. William Schenderlein
Applegate Group, Inc.
1499 W. 120s' Avenue, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80234
COLORADO
DIVISION OF
MINEgRALS
GEOLOGY
RECLAHAT ION•HININL
SAFETY•ECIENCE
Bill Owens
Governor
Russell George
Executive DlreClOr
Ronald W. Cottony
Division Director
Natural Resource Trvstee
RE: Aggregate Industries-WCR, Inc. Permit Application, Wittenberg Lakes,112c Application
No. M-2004-~1, Additional Adequacy Review Comments/Clarifications
Deaz Mr. Schenderlein:
The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) has received your October 19, 2004 responses to the
DMG's October 1, 2004 adequacy review of the Wittenberg Lakes 112 Reclamation Permit
application. and would like to have a few items addressed in more detail,. The Division is required to
make a recommendation to the Mined Land Reclamation Boazd (MLRB) no later than October 27,
2004, therefore, your response to the following items should be received by the Division by noon on
October 25, 2004, in order to give the Division some time to review the responses.
The Division's questions all relate to 3. Exhibit G- Water Information
The applicant's October 19, 2004 response states that " If, during dewatering, or after installation of
the slurry wall, the relative groundwater elevation between two or more of the wells differs from the
seasonal baseline conditions by more than two (2) feet, the Division will be notified. The Division
would like a clarification of the wording, if any one well differs from the seasonal baseline conditions
by more than two (2) feet the Division should be notified. Also please describe how the "seasonal
baseline condition" will be measured to determine if the two foot difference has occurred . Finally,
although the applicant states that the Division will be notified, no notification time frame is proposed.
The Division requests that they be notified within five (5) working days of the time that the two foot
difference is observed.
Pleased be advised that the Aggregate Industries-WCR, Inc. 112c Application maybe deemed
inadequate, and the application may be recommended for denial on October 27, 2004 unless the above
mentioned adequacy review items are addressed to the satisfaction of the Division. If you feel that
more time is needed to complete your reply, the Division can grant an extension to the decision date.
This would be done upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a recommendation to the Boazd
by the October 27, 2004 deadline, and a request for additional time. This must be received no later than
October 27, 2004.
v
Office of Office of Colorado
Minod I and Rerlamatinn Acfive and Inactive Mines Geoloeical Survev