My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE104684
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE104684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:50 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:26:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/16/2000
Doc Name
MAMM CREEK GRAVEL PIT ROARING FORK RESOURCES FILE NO M-2000-113
From
DMG
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiii u <br />STATE OF CO~~~.r~vv <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3561 <br />FA%~. (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: Thursday, November 16, 2000 <br />TO: Gregg Squire L <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson ~ / <br />RE: Mamm Creek Gravel Pit, Roaring Fork Resources, File No. M-2000-113 <br />In order to evaluate geomorphic stability issues related to the Mamm Creek Pit application, the <br />following documents have been reviewed: <br />• the original application package submitted by Roazing Fork Resources; <br />• the Mamm Creek Pit 100 year flood plain maps prepared by Balaz and Associates; <br />• the letter from Grant Brothers dated October 5, 2000 discussing [he application; <br />• the adequacy review memo from Tom Schreiner dated November 1, 2000; <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFEiY <br />Bill Owcns <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walche~ <br />&ecuuve Director <br />Michael B Lang <br />Dieision Dneetor <br />• the letter describing the city of Rifle's concerns with the application and dated November 1, 2000. <br />Based on this review, it has been determined that the following issues must be addressed before the <br />Division can make a recommendation to approve the Mamm Creek Pit application. <br />1. The application states that the estiFttnted depth of mining in the renewable resource area will be 5 <br />feet. The shallow depth of excavation combined with the proposed 150 foot unmined barriers at <br />either end of the renewable resource area make it unlikely that this excavation would have <br />significant adverse impact on the Colorado River geomorphology. However, the language required <br />to make the reclamation permit enforceable must be an unequivocal commitment from the <br />Applicant that mining in the renewable resource area will not exceed 5 feet. Limitation on the depth <br />of excavation is one of the mitigating factors for in-stream gravel harvesting discussed in the <br />Division of Minerals and Geology "In-Stream Aggregate Extraction and Reclamation Guidance <br />Document," dated August 1998. As discussed in Tom Schreiner's memo, the Operator must <br />establish baseline cross sections in the renewable resource area with permanent survey monuments <br />located outside the area to be disturbed. The depth of mining can then be periodically evaluated and <br />documented. <br />The application states that the 150 foot unmined barrier at the upstream end of the renewable <br />resource area will include large boulders placed along the toe of the slope for stabilization of the <br />bank in high flow events. The Division envisions this installation as being a headcutting prevention <br />measure, but the configuration of the installation is not clear in the text of the application. The <br />Division will require that the Applicant provide sketches and/or cross-sections [o illustrate the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.