My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50584
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/1990
Doc Name
SENECA II ANNUAL POSTMINING TOPOGRAPHY
From
MLRD
To
CARL MOUNT
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIillll III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fn%:303 832-8106 <br />DATE: May 10, 1990 <br />T0: Carl Mount /~ <br />FROM: Tim King <br />RE: Seneca II Annual Postmining Topography <br />OF ~a(p <br />lF'.~9 <br />n~ ~~ <br />`{~~. <br />~ 1H~6 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Gtrrema <br />Fretl R. Banta, <br />Drvivon Director <br />On this date I reviewed the 1989 Annual Postmining Topography map, submitted <br />by Peabody Coal Company for the Seneca II Mine. This submittal is labeled <br />"Annual Postmining Topography", drawing #0260-900423. I compared this map <br />with the approved Postmine Contour Map by overlaying them upon the light table. <br />The concerns that I voiced in my memo to you of September 26, 1989 still <br />exist. Generally, "the contours were only slightly similar." The most recent <br />submittal of the annual map "exhibited more diversity, with both steeper and <br />flatter slopes and much more undulating topography." <br />Also submitted with this 1989 Annual Postmining Topography map were 4 cross <br />sections; G-G' and H-H' which refer to the Wadge pit; and I-I' and J-J' which <br />refer to the Wolf Creek pit. Concerning the Wadge'pit, it appears that the <br />existing topography and the proposed topography are reasonable close to each <br />other except at the eastern end or bottom of the pit. It appears that spoil <br />ridges still exist there. Concerning the Wolf Creek Pit, cross section I-I' <br />shows the existing topography matching the proposed topography, However, <br />cross section J-J' shows a substantial difference. The existing topography <br />shows a gentler slope with much more even undulation. The Division might <br />consider this as an acceptable alternative to the proposed topography. <br />~qq / II /l j ~ ,. <br />P'CG<~• ''C C. (/1 ~fS-~V ~1wF tl.l {'1 .~--•"~- S.r c~{i, ~.} ~i.~ ~ El ~~,, 'l:- <br />t / ~( ( <br />'~D°~~ri.r~yt~:vi ~.e~Oc j,"r ffrr~ ~l~ (Ia r Gf (t nGt/(<(f Ll`,~~'t ~~s ~ kCU ~4Ji'~I <br />JaU[L~.I!(~J oI '~~, I-INttk.r.l I/Dc~'~'M~~trg5~eft ~J'q.~.~1 i~t,r.~1~ ~i ('~~'~ti~r,.y ~,ir <br />r ~ <br />tf-- II tt ~~' ~ ~~{5'Stl~'~til <br />CGr~cL( s11~1~1~1C~'G~7~i (J/{/1( f~~, ~{)r~.!"! ~ irtirr~ ) <br />f> {- I f . <br />7129F/s gl~~ 4 `~0 1~~~,~ ~~ fo <br />6tie~, t,, 4 ` ~ ~j <br />7u,~a~'f'~1 <br />,y /° '~0 <br />;~ <br />~~w.1c l~~ Gr~f;.4r~1,,.,y IsUe e~ -. <br />~ ,. <br />.f. ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.