Laserfiche WebLink
' {. <br />.~ <br />May 1, 1984 <br /> <br />Ms. Sandra Emrich <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Stipulation No. 3 <br />No. 9 Mine Findings Document <br />Dear Sandy: <br />The above stipulation requires Empi <br />studies in the Eagle No. 5 Mine and <br />the results of the study by August of <br />the Department findings document, <br />necessity of this stipulation. This <br />stipulation had been proposed for the <br />was modified to seta threshold level <br />establishment of a threshold level wa <br />Empire Energy. <br />need to obtain approval as soon as possible. This need was associated <br />with Empire's intent of using a part of the No. 9 Mine backfill material <br />as fill for the coal storage pad. The time frame established to complete <br />construction of the pad did not allow for further discussion of <br />stipulation No. 3. <br />~~ ~~ <br />RECEIVED <br />MAY 0 2 1934 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVrSIOM <br />Colo. Dept. of Natural Resources <br />re Energy to conduct annual inflow <br />to submit a report of same detailing <br />the same year. During discussion of <br />Empire strongly disagreed with the <br />was based upon the argument that this <br />Eagle No. 5 findings document but it <br />for warranting an inflow study. The <br />s acceptable to both the Division and <br />Stipulation No. 3 of the above document was accepted by Empire due to the <br />Empire is not suggesting that the review and approval schedule was <br />prepared in such a manner as to cause the above situation. It appears it <br />is just a matter of coincidence that it resulted in a timing problem for <br />Empire. <br />mpire Energy Corporation <br />P O BOX 66. CRAIG COLORADO fii626 <br />IJW ~ 62a 62x6 <br />