Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STAT£ OF <br />~_. -- <br />~ry~~~ ..,~..w: <br />Y. Y,~: <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 66(x3567 <br />FAJ(: 1303) 832-8106 <br />June 5, 1996 <br />Mr. Tomy S. Garcia <br />Pmwers County <br />P. O. Box 668 <br />Holly, CO 81047 <br />RE: WALKER PTT - M-84-140/R'ALKER PIT - M-84-141/BERNARD NINE <br />Dear Mr. Garcia: <br />DEPARTMENT' OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. lochhead <br />Executive Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />- M-84-134 <br />As we previously discussed, a 110 permit can be converted to a 112 permit, as long has the opeLator <br />has held the permit for two consecutive years (Rule 1.11.2(1)). <br />Currently, there are no limits to the amount of acreage in a 112 permit. Howeve~ the permitted <br />acreage must be contiguous. <br />If your information is correct, the Bernard Nine Pit can be converted to a 112 perm t, even though <br />the permit area will be three (3) miles long. The Walker Pits, however, do not t the criteria <br />for contiguous acreage, since, it appears, there will be a one-mile separation betty the north and <br />south areas. Therefore, you cannot combine both permits into one 112 permit. Y u may convert <br />each of the 110 permits to a 112 permit, as long as the pernitted acreage is Conti ous. <br />You can determine your conversion acreage by standard surveying methods, on an <br />photo, by measuring the center of the creek bed and the average width of the propose <br />or by any other method, as long as the entire proposed affected land is within the pE <br />If you have any other questions, please let me know. <br />Sincerely, <br />\ James Dilhe <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />JD/gaw <br />.curate aerial <br />affected land <br />rit boundary. <br />M:\aar\pv\Cucia.jd <br />