Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />June 1, 1989 <br />Ms. Jean Olson <br />P.O. Box 653 <br />Hayden, CO 81639 <br />Re: Telephone conversations of May 19, 1989 and May 23, 1989 <br />Seneca II W Mine, File C-82-057 <br />Dear Ms. Olson: <br />I would like to summarize our telephone conversations <br />and 23rd, 1989 concerning the matter of your domestic <br />We discussed whether Peabody Coal Company's (Peabody) <br />would have an impact on your well. You asked if they <br />an agreement with you regarding compensation for dama~ <br />mining operation. <br />with you on May 19th <br />and agricultural well. <br />Seneca II-W coal mine <br />were obligated to sign <br />Ie to the well from the <br />The Division's understanding is that Peabody has signed an agreement with you <br />concerning Olson Spring; a well completed in the alluvium next to your house. <br />The Division further understands that Peabody will not, at this time, sign an <br />agreement with you on the deep well that is also in proximity to your house. <br />Peabody claims that the deep well is completed in a geologic formation that <br />they have not encountered in their drilling program at the Seneca II-W mine, <br />therefore, their mining operation could not impact it. You, however, claim <br />that Peabody's operation could indeed impact the well. <br />On Tuesday, May 23, 1989, Cathy Begej, a groundwater hydrologist on our staff <br />discussed with you the probability of damage to your well and your protection <br />under our laws. <br />Ms. Begej noted in your phone conversation that two Regulations of the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining protect your water <br />rights. Rule 4.05.15 requires that a coal operator must replace any water <br />supply injured by mining and Rule 2.04.7(3) requires an Augmentation Plan to <br />specifically address how the operator will replace the water supply. Peabody <br />did not have an Augmentation Plan prepared when the permit was issued in <br />1985, so the Division wrote a binding stipulation to the permit which requires <br />submittal of the plan prior to disturbance in the main permit area. This <br />plan is to be supplied to all owners of affected water rights to allow their <br />comment on the plan. Your comments would be directed to the Division while <br />we review the Plan. If you are in disagreement with our decision on the <br />acceptability of the Augmentation Plan, then you mdy appeal our decision to <br />the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />