GENERAL47670 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

III IIIIIIIIIIIII III STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY Depamncnl of Nalurdl Resources I} I 1 $hcnnan SL, Ruum ! I S J+L11 Denver, Gdumdo riU?U 1 ~ ` Phone: (Nlll riLb-45L7 IIII PA1< 1 III II ri I? ri I OL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Date: October 16 1996 , Roy Romer Governor To: Janet Binns Mmes S Lnchhead E%M1111Ve Direclor ~~~~• Michael d Lang From: Kent Gorham r'( Dmrs~orr Direclor ~ RE: Permit Pages, CYCC permit, #C-81-071 As you are aware, CYCC is in the process of incorporating RN-Ol pages into their permit, as well as correcting those pages and areas of the permit where text did not flow from page to page. Recently, I updated the specialist copy as per Karl Koehler's instructions and also sent him an adequacy letter on those areas of instructions where I had a problem, discrepancy, or question. One of those areas was the beginning of section 776, which is attached. Karl's instructions basically dropped these pages from the permit. As these pages deal with development drill sites in the permit area and are disturbed areas by definition, I don't think these pages can be dropped without a more formal process, such as bond release. I will leave the final resolution up to you. Also, along those same lines, we talked sometime ago about how small, outlying disturbed sites should be handled with regard to sampling and reference areas vs. standards. It was my understanding that the VTF folks were going to discuss that and come to some consensus on how these areas should be handled. Have those discussions resulted in any progress on this issue? If not, maybe this could be a topic for discussion at a coal staff meeting. In the near future, Golden Eagle will be asking questions about this issue, so it would assist me if we can figure this one out in the next 6 months. Thanks.