My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44937
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44937
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:26:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/4/1992
Doc Name
CORLEY COMPANYS PROPOSED DIVERSION
From
CATHY BEGEJ
To
STEVE RENNER
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />r it <br />DATE: November 4, 1992 <br />T0: Steve Renner and Dan Hernandez <br />FROM: Cathy Begej C L(J~ <br />RE: Corley Company's Proposed Diversion <br />I have quickly reviewed Dr. Corley's plan to divert water into the Magpie Creek Diversion east of <br />the pond. This plan calls for the construction of a 6' deep triangular ditch with 1:1 side slopes <br />running from the unnamed creek east, along the south side of the pond, discharging approximately <br />375' east of the pond at a point 18 feet above the Magpie Channel. Dr. Corley proposes to have <br />this ditch run over the 30" culvert which would collect water from the West Pit and direct it to the <br />pond. The profile suggests that fill will be installed on the west end and that a cut will be dug on <br />the east end. I looked at the sizing of the diversion, its location and the general mass balance of <br />the cut and fill. <br />11 There does not appear to be adequate depth fora 6' deep ditch and a 2 1 /2' deep culvert if <br />the proposed profile is the land surface at the top of the ditch. The profile of the ditch <br />alignment shows a node for the 30" CMP at 150.75' and the proposed topography map <br />shows the culvert inlet at 151' and the outlet at 149' (presumably, the node marks the <br />culvert invert elevation, but it wouldn't hurt to confirm thisl• That puts the top of the <br />culvert at 153.5 ' at the inlet and 151.5' at the outlet. <br />21 The ditch i~ersized ate r event. T argest calculated~~e 10 year 5~~ /O"c° °'~ <br />flow,the Unn d Cre icfs, ch wou resa dept ofF 3.6'. ~n'^'"P'~~"5 <br />~ .s rcLt s /cry <br />31 The ditch probably should be rip-rapped for protection from erosion; the design velocities u,J3 <br />range from 5.1 - 5.7 fps. I would recommend rip-rap with a D60 of 6" - 9". , ~ ~ <br />4) I have great difficulty with a ditch of a 1 °k grade. It is difficult to accurately construct and <br />I would like a commitment for certification of its installation. <br />51 The ouffall of the ditch needs to be protected. There is an 18' elevated drop in the 36°h <br />slope between the end of the ditch and the bottom of Magpie Creek. The 10 year - 24 <br />hour storm event will erode this slope severely. In addition the water will enter the Energy <br />Fuels lease area. <br />61 What type of ditch stabilization work is anticipated following construction, i.e., is the ditch <br />going to be seeded and will matting be put down to protect the steep side slopes? <br />71 Establishment of a fill upon which to install a ditch is generally unwise, but as such will <br />require heavily compacted fill for construction. In addition, this fill should be considerably <br />wider than the ditch. An engineer should design the fill and verify its stability in a saturated <br />state. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.