My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44378
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:09 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:59:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/1992
Doc Name
MEETING OF MARCH 10 1992 PN C-81-037
From
MLRD
To
W D CORLEY
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III sTAT~oF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1373 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 8663567 <br />FA%: 303 832-8106 <br />March 16, 1992 <br />Dr. W.D. Corley <br />P.O. Box 1821 <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80901 <br />Re: Meeting of March 10, 1992, Permit No. C-81-037 <br />Dear Dr. Corley: <br />O4' LOCO <br />nP" -~ O <br />. ~.8.~ . <br />. L <br />'re re' <br />Roy Romer. <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long, <br />Dn~sion Director <br />I would like to take this opportunity to briefly summarize our meeting of <br />March 10, 1992. Primarily, it was my intention to update you in regard as to <br />how the Division proposes to resolve a number of the GEC related issues. <br />The Division intends to reclaim GEC disturbances within Section 24. We are <br />estimating that it will take up to eight weeks to prepare the bid documents <br />such that a contract could be let. We will keep you informed as to our <br />progress in the contracting process. <br />The Division believes that a plain reading of the Harrison-Western bond <br />document indicates that Harrison is not responsible for reclamation of <br />Stockpile No. 2. This position also is supported by correspondence between <br />the Division and Harrison in 1985. We recognize that you disagree with this <br />assessment. <br />The Division believes that Harrison-Western is acting in the capacity of a <br />guarantor performing reclamation in~lieu of forfeiture. As such, they do not <br />need to obtain a permit. However, we do believe that Harrison is subject to <br />many regulatory requirements. These requirements include the specifications <br />of the reclamation plan and portions of Rules 2 and 4 applicable to <br />reclamation operations. These responsibilities will be clearly outlined in <br />the Compliance Schedule which we will negotiate with Harrison. I understand <br />that you may disagree with our interpretation of the permit requirement, <br />but that you may be more comfortable given their liability to the performance <br />standards as outlined in a Compliance Schedule. <br />You expressed concern regarding erosional stability of the West Pit, and the <br />handling of unaffected area water entering the disturbed area. These two <br />issues have been raised with Harrison-Western, and we hope to resolve them <br />during the Compliance Schedule negotiations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.