Laserfiche WebLink
/To ~'¢~~' ~i~es 1 M-fa~iS-~~b <br />r ~ , ~ ~ N1- j4~7 - 3! a <br />~ ~nergy Minerals Law Center M - l9~ - 06 <br />1911 Main Avenue, Suite 235, Durango, Colorado 81301 p <br />Phoue: (970) 375 9231 Faz: (970) 382 0316 Email: emlc@frontier.net l~-' QO~-~~~ <br />F'TjP.~a+~a~ ~ocuw~' <br />Bryyrc~e Humphries <br />+~Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />RECEIVED <br />V .1AN 3 0 1006 <br />Division of Minerals and OealoAY <br />RE: Designated Mining Operation Status of Cotter Corporation <br />JD-6, JD-8, JD-9 and SM-18 Mines <br />Dear Mr. Humphries, <br />January 27, 2006 <br />This letter is written on behalf of the San Juan Citizens Alliance, Information Network for <br />Responsible Mining (INFORM), and the Colorado Environmental Coalition and concerns the <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology ("DMG") regulation of the Cotter Corporation's JD- <br />6, JD-8, JD-9, and SM-18 mines. We appreciate the DMG's work in updating its regulatory <br />efforts over re-opening mine sites in response to the latest boom in mining activity in Colorado. <br />We look forwazd to pazticipating in the emerging efforts to bring old mines, permits, and plans <br />into compliance with the post-Summitville mining and reclamation standards. <br />The Energy Minerals Law Center (EMLC) is a project ofthe Western Mining Action Project that <br />provides legal services to communities, grass-roots groups, and Native American Tribes fighting <br />the destructive and harmful impacts of energy mineral mining. EMLC looks forward to working <br />with the DMG staff and the Mined Land Reclamation Board ("MLRB") and especially those <br />opportunities to include informed public participation in your regulatory program. <br />This letter specifically addresses the requests by Cotter Corporation to restart four uranium and <br />vanadium facilities -- JD-6, JD-8, JD-9, and SM-18 mines. DMG records indicate that these four <br />facilities were issued permits in 1979. The files indicate that the DMG considers three ofthese <br />mines -- JD-6, JD-8, JD-9 -geologically similar for purposes of determining DMO status. <br />Although the four DMO determinations are being addressed in this letter, please consider each <br />statement in support of DMG's DMO determinations and each objection to Cotter Corporation's <br />DMO appea]/application as it applies to these mines individually and cumulative. <br />DMG Properly Determined These Four Mines are Designated Mining Operafions <br />The DMG's July 15, 2005 and July 22, 2005 "SPLP results review" found toxic contaminants <br />leaching from mine facilities and therefore properly determined that the JD-6, JD-8, JD-9, and <br />SM-18 uranium/vandium mines satisfy the criteria for Designated Mining Operations. <br />("DMOs"). The subsequent July 25, 2005 DMO Notice of Determination also properly states <br />that these mines are DMOs. Cotter must therefore comply with regulations applicable to a DMO, <br />including the submission of an Environmental Protection Plan ("EPP") as specified in HRMM <br />Rule 6.4.19. <br />