My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:54:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Page 33 through OSM Mine Plan Approval
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III Doc Date:12H 1/ 02 01 <br />• The operator has provided "worst case" calculations of the amount of depletion <br />that might be suffered by the Williams Fork River through the contact of thA' <br />Williams Fork alluvium and the subcropping "E" and "F" coals in which the <br />Eagle No. 5 and No. 6 Mines are located, respectively. Inflow through the <br />Middle sandstone subcrop was also included in the calculations. A total of <br />182 gpm inflow into the mines by this means was estimated. Since over 600 gpm <br />is currently discharged into the Williams Fork and even larger amounts are <br />permitted in anticipation of future mine expansion, there would be a net gain <br />to the river from the active mining operation. <br />There is potential for the largest streamflow depletion to occur after <br />mining. After the underground coal mining activity has stopped, the mine <br />workings and overlying and underlying depleted section will begin to fill and <br />reestablish pre-mining water levels. During the period when the mine workings <br />are filling and ground water levels in the affected aquifers are rebounding, <br />the mine inflow waters will not be discharged to the surface and then to the <br />rivers. Thus any depletions of surface water from stream/alluvial systems <br />will not be augmented by mine water discharges and will continue until such <br />time as an equilibrium is reestablished between the surface and ground water <br />systems. The operator has estimated that the initial inflow rate will be <br />approximately 1,500 gpm. This will decrease as the mine fills and the head <br />differences are reduced between the mine and the various sources of the <br />inflow. Using an average inflow rate of 750 gpm, the operator has calculated <br />that the mine will take approximately 16 years to fill. As previously <br />mentioned, the operator has furnished "worst case" calculations of the amount <br />• of direct streamflow depletion resulting from inflow thru the subcrops of the <br />coal seams being mined as well as the Middle sandstone. This figure was 182 <br />gpm. As detailed in the Surface Water Section of this document, this <br />depletion is insignificant to the Q-7-10 low flow of the Williams Fork River. <br />During the active life of the mines, direct depletion of the quantity of water <br />in the Trout Creek aquifer will occur as a result of pumping for mine and <br />residential use. Empire Energy Corporation has two wells registered with the <br />State Engineer that produce from the Trout Creek sandstone; these are the No. <br />5 Mine well and the Okie Plaza well. There is also a No. 5 A supplemental <br />mine well located near the original mine well. The volume appropriated for <br />the No. 5 Mine well is 4,0 acre feet/year. A total of 5.0 acre feet/ year is <br />appropriated for the Okie Plaza well. After treatment, much of the water <br />utilized from the No. 5 Mine well, is discharged into the Williams Fork River <br />under NPDES permit. <br />The Eagle No. 5 and No. 6 Mine workings may impact the quality of ground and <br />surface water during mining following closure of the mines. Theeroof strata <br />in the zone of caving, the floor strata, and the coal seams themselves will be <br />sub,~ected to chemical weathering and leaching where in contact with mine <br />inflow water. The chemical weathering and leaching will lead to ground water <br />quality degradation. The degree of this degradation will depend on 1) the <br />geochemistry of the affected strata; 2) the thickeness affected:strata in the <br />zone of caving exposed to mine water; 3) the particle or fragment size <br />distribution of caved overburden and coal strata; 4) the exposed surface areas <br />of roof, floor, coal faces and coal pillars; 5) the geochemistry of the rock <br />• dust used; 6 mining debris left in the mines; 7) the chemistry of back-stowed <br />waste; and 8 the residency time of mine waters before discharging to the <br />surface or to the overlying or underlying strata. <br />-33- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.