GENERAL42456 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RECEIVEp III IIIIIIIIIIIII III MARR A. STEEN P.O. Box 1563 Longmont, Colorado November 1, 1984 Mr. Steve Ellis Zonfng Administrator Boulder County Planning Department P.O. Box 47I Boulder, Colorado 80302 Dear Mr. Ellis: 80501 ~~, , ~~ -• ~~'~ Z,'fr 'FDrr The purpose of this letter is to request confirmation from the Boulder County Planning Department that our proposed mining and milling operations at the Who Do, Bellevue, Hazel A„ White Cloud, and Wynona mines will be in conformance with Boulder County's existing zoning regulations. These mines, and our proposed millsite, are located in the Gold Hill mining district, near our currently operating Cash mine. The Who Do and Bellevue mines are situated in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 72 West. The Hazel A. mine is situated in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 1 North. The White Cloud and Wynona mines are situated in the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 72 West. Our proposed millsite is situated near the Wynona and White Cloud mines. All of these properties are within a contiguous claim group. These mines and our proposed millsite are contained within the boundaries of the following patented lode mining claims: Bellevue Lode claim No, 422, Columbus Lode claim No. 260, Comet No. 2 Lode claim No. 413 (southeasterly 1100 feet), Cy Eaton Lode claim No. 15825, Donald R. Lode claim No. 20656, Eugene Lode claim No. 101, Fitzsimmon Lode claim No. 16075, Franklin Lode claim No, 15825, Good Enough Lode claim No. 15838, Hazel A. Lode claim No. 15825, Hercules Lode claim No. 5604, John G. Lode claim No. 15825, Keystone State Lode claim No. 161, Oscar Lode claim No. 17992, Time Lode claim No. 6034, Trumbo Lode claim No. 589, White Cloud Lode claim No. 102, Who Do Lode claim No. 110, and the Wynona Lode claim No. 112. This