Laserfiche WebLink
%'Y 1 <br />-S ~ _. <br />III III III III IIII III <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />ncp, rtmrm of Nalu ral Rc~ourcec I~~~~~ <br />I } I } tihcrman SI , Roum ? I S <br />ncnvcr, Colorado RO_'ll i <br />I'I~unr 14U JI OLfi-15L7 <br />I n\:1}041 R)2~H1 OL <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />DATE: November 6, 1995 RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Gorernor <br />TO: Steve Brown <br />lames lu<hhead <br />~.er~~~~e om•cm~ <br />FROM: Christine Johnsto n,l~haol u. lrnp <br />u~,~~~~~n n r~~ ~,~, <br />RE: O.C. 1f2 Coal Mine; Permit No. C-80-002 <br />The Division will soon be in a situation in which we forfeit the <br />bond or return money back for reclamation completed at the O.C. ~2 <br />Coal Mine. The mine is located in Gunnison County, about 17 miles <br />to the north of the town of Gunnison. It was an underground mine <br />with approximately 3.2 acres of disturbance and is operated by Mr. <br />Bob Weaver. Reclamation of the site was supposed to completed by <br />November 1, 1995, but was not completed. we will proceed with <br />issuing a NOV, but our next actions will be dependant on the <br />operator. Mr. Weaver expressed to me a few weeks ago that he would <br />like us to forfeit the bond. We have identified an alternate <br />option, which would extend the completion of reclamation to the <br />spring of 1996 (see attached). Mr. Weaver has not made a final <br />decision. <br />My question for you is in regards to the bond instrument. <br />Previously, the Division was holding a Letter of Credit (LC) for <br />$36,000.00. On October 28, 1992, the First National Bank of <br />Gunnison notified the Division that they were not going to extend <br />the LC past the maturity date. The operator did not submit a <br />replacement bond, so on December 29, 1992, we drew on the LC and <br />now hold a cash bond for $36,000.00. I have enclosed this <br />correspondence for your review. <br />Given this situation, do we have a relationship with the bank that <br />would require or allow us to offer them the opportunity to reclaim <br />the site and avoid forfeiture (Rule 3.04.2(5))? In addition, if <br />we do forfeit the bond and complete reclamation and there is money <br />left over, do we return that money to the bank or to Mr. Weaver? <br />Also, if Mr. weaver were to reclaim the site and he receives bond <br />release, do we return that money to the bank or to Mr. Weaver? <br />I presume that Mr. Weaver had to post some sort of collateral to <br />receive the LC. That collateral may have became invalid, and the <br />bank decided not to extend the LC. To answer the question of who <br />receives the money in the event of bond forfeiture or bond release, <br />we need to determine if Mr. Weaver's debt is still outstanding with <br />