My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36222
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976032
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/27/1993
Doc Name
NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~iii~i~ii~i«iiir~i <br />TELLUFIDE TIMES+IOURNAL <br />Telluride, CO <br />(San Miguel County) <br />Thu, 3,479 <br />COLORADO PRESS <br />Y <br />Officials tackle gravel violations <br />by David Owen <br />Cooperation seemed to be <br />the spirit of the day when repre- <br />sentatives of local, state and <br />federal entities met last week to <br />discuss violations at the Tellu- <br />rideGravel gravel pit on the San <br />Miguel River. <br />The May 19 worksession was <br />called by San Miguel County <br />Sanitation ExpertDaveSchneck <br />and attended by all three San <br />Miguel Cou my Commissioners <br />and Telluride Gravel Owner <br />Gary Bennett. <br />Preceded by a walking tour <br />of the site, the discussion opened <br />with Rick Sherman of the De- <br />partmentof Wildlifeexplaining <br />that "headcutting" -a process <br />whereby more material is re- <br />moved than replenished, caus- <br />ingsloughing ofthe riverbanks <br />- had caused significant ero- <br />sion along the south fork of the <br />San Miguel. <br />This, Sherman said, resulted <br />in noticeable changes in the <br />green beltthatsurvives theriver, <br />as well as a dropping watertable. <br />In 1992, the Mary E Camp- <br />ground was ordered closed so <br />575 dead or dying cottonwood <br />trees could be removed. <br />Sherman, while admitting he <br />was not an ezpeR in hydrology, <br />suggested the construction of a <br />stabilizing structure tv allow the <br />river to rebuild. , <br />He said he believed this could <br />be done while the main fork of <br />the river was still being mined <br />for the areas vast gravel needs. <br />[t was noted that the <br />headcutting had largely taken <br />place on Forest' Service land, <br />and that any type ofreclamation <br />would also occur on that land. A <br />representative of the Forest Ser- <br />vice said there was a meeting <br />planned for this week to discuss <br />the situation. <br />U.S. Fish and' Wildlife Divi- <br />sionrepresentative LucyJordan <br />cautioned against bashing into a <br />reclamation program, express- <br />ing her feeling that rivers are <br />dynamic systems and nota lot is <br />known about how the system <br />might react <br />Bennett pledged to cooper- <br />ate with the different agencies <br />and expressed his pleasure at <br />the meeting, which he said gave <br />him a cohesive idea of what <br />needed to be done. In the past, <br />Bennett said he received differ- <br />ent information from different <br />groups, which was frustrating. <br />Bennett said he would hire a <br />consultant to help him deal with <br />the different pecnrits and plans <br />involved in the reclamation. A <br />second meeting was scheduled <br />for July 14 so that communica- <br />tion could continue among the <br />numerous parties involved. <br />In keeping with the spirit of <br />the meeting, Sherman added, <br />"If they go to court this is going <br />to cost somebody a whole lotof . <br />money, let use that money for <br />reclamation instead." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.