Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />8703 Bonhomme <br />Houston, Texas 77074 <br />(713)995-7045 <br />Telecopier <br />!71'71 90S_7101 <br />Law Offices of <br />Jim Tatum & Associates P.O. Box 86 <br />12630 Hwy. 12 <br />. Weston, Colorado 81091 <br />~r i -.~: (719) 868-33]0 <br />Telecopier <br />.. X99': ,"o, ore ,~„ <br />Fi V <br />October 12, 1993 <br />Mr. Daniel I. Hernandez <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Mr. Joseph J. Dudash <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />•.L°' •' <br />,~,~ - ~ • <br />,,,. <br />VIA C.M.R.R.R. #P 155 734 849 <br />VIA C.M.R.R.R. #P 155 734 848 <br />RE: Tatum Property Las Animas County, Colorado <br />Gentlemen: <br />I am increasingly concerned about what is being done here. I am <br />looking over the Mid-Term Permit Review of December, 1992, by .Joseph <br />Dudash. <br />Rule 4.20.1 regarding subsidence damage. <br />Rule 2.06. 5(6)(a) relating to the damage to our water well. <br />Rule 2.05.6(6)(e)(ii) description of aquifer. <br />What about the requirements of Rule 2.05.6(6)(b) regarding worst <br />possible subsidence consequences? Was this ever done and if not, why not? <br />It appears that prior correspondence from your office concludes that <br />no material damage could occur to our adobe buildings ---- it is <br />abundantly clear that the regulations call. for a subsidence monitoring <br />program. It is undisputed that this has not been done pursuant to the <br />requirements of Rule 2.05.6(c). Why hasn't this been done and why hasn't <br />your office enforced this law? <br />I am also concerned about the requirements of § 784.20 30 CFR Chapter <br />