My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31355
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:59:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/30/1987
Doc Name
PIT 1 SEDIMENT POND REMOVAL DEMONSTRATION
From
MLRD
To
GRASSY GAP FILE C-81-039
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III P`°~rf <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Dlreetor <br />DATE: July 30, 1987 <br />T0: Grassy Gap File - C-81-039 <br />FROM: Candy Thompson <br />RE: PIT N0. 1 SEDIMENT POND REMOVAL DEMONSTRATION <br />I reviewed the calculations submitted by the operator for sediment pond <br />removal at the Pit No. 1 area. The vegetative sampling at the pit and <br />calculations have been compared to the requirements of Rule 4,05.2(2), The <br />compliance requirements are discussed point by point below in regards to the <br />Pit No. 1 area. <br />1, Vegetative success: In June of 1987 the operator sampled vegetation at <br />Pit No, 1 according to MLRD requirements, The vegetation cover was 56%. <br />From the permit application the pre-mining cover for the mountain shrub <br />community was 31,1%: The herbaceous cover for Pit No. 1 is greater than <br />90% of the original, <br />2, Comparison of soil loss from reclaimed vs. undisturbed site: The <br />operator utilized the Universal Soil Loss Equation to compare the <br />disturbed and undisturbed condition, No soil sampling for erodability <br />was done. However, the figure used for the disturbed condition is <br />conservative: The soil loss predicted off both conditions was 0.23 <br />tons/acre/year, Therefore, the disturbed land is contributing no more <br />sediment than the undisturbed site. <br />3. Receiving Stream Standards: There are no springs evident to date off the <br />Pit No. 1 area. Also, no appreciable spring development is predicted. <br />THerefore, receiving stream standards for chemical constituents will be <br />in compliance, There are no applicable standards for suspended sediment <br />for the receiving streams. <br />Based upon compliance with the above factors the Division approves <br />removal of the Pit No. 1 sediment pond. <br />/vjr <br />1480E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.