Laserfiche WebLink
Burnell, Jim <br />From: Mathews, Dan <br />Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:57 AM <br />To: Burnell, Jim <br />Subject: RE: West Elk PR-10 comments <br />Jim <br />I hope this is not too late for you <br />For Item 112, they acknowledged at the meeting that they did not substantively respond to the request to provide the <br />requested Map 66. They seemed to think that updates to the map are not warranted, and that the original reconnaissance <br />mapping is still valid. It may be that we can accept the original map, and factor in some worst case assumptions to cover <br />possible land use changes since the original mapping was completed, but I at this point we need to have them respond to <br />the original comment, and submit the map for inclusion in the permit. I guess my comment would be: Please submit the <br />required mapping and revised narrative as warranted, as previously requested in Item 112. <br />For Item 114, they need to specifically address the requests in items (a), (b), and (c). Specific commitments need to be <br />included in the permit regarding these measures (I don't think a consultant's "suggestions" or "recommendations" suffice). <br />Please include specific plans or commitments addressing the issues in Items (a) and (b). Various <br />recommendations and suggestions for monitoring and precautionary measures included in the Exhibit 60 B <br />consultant's report, need to be incorporated into the appropriate permit text. The outdated narrative regarding <br />the augmentation plan noted in Item (c) needs to be properly updated, as requested. <br />For Item 115, I will entrust you and Kent to assess these issues, taking into account the rambling discourse in my memo of <br />January 13, 2005, regarding subsidence, stream/alluvium/wetlands issues. <br />For Items 116, 116a, and 120, I think you can just use the lwld wording from my memo of January 12, 2005 <br />-----Original Message-- <br />From: Burnell, Jim <br />Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM <br />To: Mathews, Dan <br />Subject: West Elk PR-10 comments <br />Dan, do you want to revise any of your comments as a result of that meeting last week? <br />Jim <br />