My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-07-07_REVISION - M1998013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1998013
>
2003-07-07_REVISION - M1998013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:43:12 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:49:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/7/2003
Doc Name
Amendment and all subsequent revisions
From
BLC Development LLC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BLC DEVELOPMENT, LLC <br />P.O. Box 72 <br />Lucerne, CO 80646 <br />(970)353-7055 <br />July 2, 2003 <br />Greg E. Walcher <br />Executive Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Shem~an Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Robert W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />RECEIVED / <br />JUL 0 7 2003 r/ <br />Division ~t Minerals and Geology <br />1111 - o I ~ <br />Denver, CO~ 3 / _ (~ W ~ ~ <br />Re: Shores, Amendment to Permit No. M-1998A13, and all Subsequent Revisions <br />Gentlemen: <br />Hall-Irwin has demanded that we advise your office of a technical correction to our letter dated June 12, <br />2003. Please be advised that <br />Paragraph 4, page two should read as follows: <br />"Buyer shall obtain the written approval of such mining plan from the Seller, which approvals <br />Seller shall not unreasonably withheld. Seller's approval or disapproval of the mining plan <br />shall be based on the criterion set forth above and once approved, Seller shall not further <br />challenee the miningplan." <br />The substantive requirements of this section do not change in that Hall-Irwin must obtain BLC <br />Development's written approval of any Mining Plan. Of course, Hall-Irwin did not advise BLC <br />Development that it was amending the Mining Plan and certainly did not obtain its written approval. <br />Hall-Irwin also suggests that it has acknowledgements of receipt of certified mail from BLC <br />Development, LLC; however, Hall-Irwin has failed to provide copies. To our knowledge, we <br />received no such notice and our review of the files of the Division of Mining and Geology did not <br />reveal such certificates. BLC Development cannot state with certainty that notices were not delivered <br />to its offices, but BLC Development is very skeptical of Hall-hwin's statements. The absence of any <br />certificates in the Division of Mineral and Geology files and the fact that Hall-lrwin did not even <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.