My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV101841
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV101841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:12:22 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:49:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/9/1994
Doc Name
HAYDEN GULCH LOADOUT PN C-92-081 TR-01 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING
From
MLRD
To
DAVID A BERRY
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 60203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FAx. 303 832-8106 <br />February 9, 1994 <br />To: David A. Berry <br />From: Janet Binns~ <br />Re: Hayden Gulch Loadout (C-92-081): <br />Groundwater Monitoring. <br />pF' COQ <br />.~, _ Oq9 <br />Ne~p <br />it _ ("7 ~`OO <br />• !•8J 7~ 6 ~ <br />Foy Ramer, <br />Governor <br />Michael B. LOng. <br />Division Director <br />Technical Revision No. 1, Surface and <br />Dave, at long last we have received Peabody's submittal for the Hayden Gulch Loadout <br />water monitoring plan in response to the Division's adequacy concerns last fall. To jog your <br />memory, you and I had a conference call with Ted Smith and Brian Dunfee of Peabody <br />Western's Flagstaff office back in October. During the call I believe we decided that <br />Peabody would provide: <br />1) Details and an explanation of the gain/loss conductivity study. <br />2) Explanation of and results from a coal leach test. <br />3) Maps showing proposed and actual locations of monitoring sites. <br />4) And a proposed monitoring plan. <br />I read through it all and I think they included everything we requested. I will include a copy <br />of our PAR letter and any other pertinent communications as well. I made my comments <br />in pencil on their submittal (for what they're worth). So, the actual point of this memo to <br />you, would you be able to review this submittal and give me your recommendations within <br />the next 2 weeks. Peabody neglected to request an extension but I would like to see a <br />Decision on this by the end of February. If you need any other information from the file, <br />please let me know. Larry had wanted to keep you involved on this since you've had some <br />involvement since last spring, <br />Let me know if you have any conflicts or need more info. <br />Thanks. <br />m: \coal\jhb\c92081\trOldab.2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.