My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95521
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:50:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/28/1995
Doc Name
KERR COAL CO MARR MINE TR 13 PIT 1 APPROXIMATE ORIGINAL CONTOUR CONFIGURATION PN C-80-006
From
DMG
To
WALLY ERICKSON
Type & Sequence
TR13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLOI~UU <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-.3567 <br />FA%:(303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: April 28, 1995 <br />T0: Wally Erickson <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br /> <br />I~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames S. Lochhead <br />Eseculive Director <br />Michael 8. Long <br />Division Director <br />RE: Kerr Coal "mpany, arr Mine, Technical Revision 13, <br />Pit No. 1 p mate Original Contour Configuration <br />(Permit No: C-80-006) <br />I ha~~e finally managed to review the T.R. 13 application which you <br />fonA~arded to my attenmtion several months ago. This application, <br />required of Kerr by settlement agreement with DMG and OSMRE, presents <br />the required amendment to the backfilled configuration of the Marr mine <br />Pit Flo. 1. <br />Geouechnically, because every modification appears to flatten the <br />eventual slopes, I don't perceive that any slope stability problems will be <br />encountered by the enhanced reclamation grading. The only concern I <br />foresee will be consolidation of the backfilled portions of Pit No. 1. Marr <br />has evidenced consolidation of backfill previously. Any cracking should be <br />treatable with minimal clean up and filling of cracks. At the worst minor <br />regrading might be required if gradient reversals were to occur in the <br />lower gradient drainage swales. <br />In my opinion, the proposed design is acceptable as proposed. <br />cc: David Berry <br />Doc: M:/COAL/JAP/MARRPITI.TR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.