My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94154
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94154
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:19:43 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:38:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/11/1995
Doc Name
GEOCHEMICAL REVIEW JUNE 5 1995 LETTER FROM CC&V TO B KEFFELEW REGARDING CONTACT TESTS CC&V CRESSON
From
DMG
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~: ~ ~ -~ •~1 iiiiiiiiiii iii iiii i <br />• t, / 999 <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 rr <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 ~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Phone: 1]03) 866-3567 II <br />FAX: 13031832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br /> Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br />DATE: July 11, 1995 lames 5. Lochhead <br />Ezecwive Director <br /> michael B. Long <br />TO• Berhan Keffelew Division Direcor <br />FROM: Harry Posey <br />RE: Geochemical review: June 5, 1995 letter from CC&V to B. Keffelew regarding <br />"Contact Tests;" CC&V, Cresson Project, Permit No. M-80-244. <br />METHOD OF EVALUATION: <br />General: Based on the proposed uses of the materials discussed, it is evident that waters which pass <br />through the waste rock will discharge to surface water in some cases and to groundwater in others. <br />On that basis, we compared the "contact test" results from the Pad 2 material to in-place surface <br />water standards (for potential surface water discharges) and to a combination of ambient <br />groundwater measurements and drinking water standards (for potential discharges to groundwater). <br />This comparison was direct; it does not consider any potential dilution, attenuation effects on the <br />discharges themselves, or transit time effects between the discharge points and points of compliance. <br />Measurements or model calculations that factor in attenuation, dilution, metals precipitation, or <br />transit time, if they are to be considered, should be submitted by the Operators. <br />Surface Water Standards: The operator has submitted to the WQCC proposed standards and <br />proposed interim standards for surface waters for Arequa Gulch and Squaw Gulch. WQCD has <br />stated that the proposed standards are not acceptable to them. They indicated further that the <br />standards which apply presently to Arequa and Squaw Gulches are those in place for Segment 21 <br />of Cripple Creek and its tributaries. Given this illustration based upon the present standards. <br />Groundwater Standards: The Division has established that discharges to groundwater at the <br />Cresson operation must meet the higher of either the Table Value Drinking Water Standards or the <br />ambient groundwater quality as measured at the Carlton Tunnel discharge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.