My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93787
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:15:06 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:35:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/1/1993
Doc Name
MEMO PHONE CONVERSATION
From
DMG
To
TR 63 FN C-80-007
Type & Sequence
TR63
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY oe~eo~ <br />~ <br />Department o(Natural Resources " <br />~ <br />~e % ., <br />~ <br />215 <br />R . <br />t~ <br />oom <br />1313 Sherman St., . <br />Denver, CO 8020} +e ~6 ' <br />Phone: 130:51 866-3567 <br />FA%: (303) 832-8106 Rny Rnmer <br /> Governor <br /> Michael B. Long <br /> MF.Mfl17 L W IITTM Uimsion Direuor <br />DATE: February 1, 1993 <br />TO: Technical Revision 63 File; File No. C-80-007 <br />FROM: Christine E. Johnston <br />RE: Phone Conversation <br />I spoke with Kathy Welt of Mountain Coal Company on this date. We <br />discussed a number of things including the status of MCC's <br />responses to the Division's preliminary adequacy letter dated <br />January 7, 1993. In this letter, I asked for MCC's responses to be <br />submitted to the Division by January 29, 1993, so that we would <br />have sufficient time to review the res~nses and provide a proposed <br />decision by February 8, 1993. <br />The responses were not received on January 29, 1993. Ms. Welt <br />stated that she did not realize I had specified a date in my <br />letter. She also said that they (MCC) had been working on the <br />responses due for Stipulations 44 and 45 (Renewal issues), which <br />were also due on January 29, 1993. The deadline for the above <br />stipulations had been moved back twice upon the request of MCC. <br />Because the proposed decision is due next week, I suggested that <br />MCC should ask for an extension to the deadline of February 8, <br />1993. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.