My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93696
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:15:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:33:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986076
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/18/1994
Doc Name
GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY REVIEW INCAS MINE 110D AMENDMENT PN M-86-076
From
DMG
To
TOM GILLIS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F10`J 18 '9J 11~35'r+!•1 pIV:P1IPIEF.RL~.RC•EOLUG! <br />+ • III IIIIIIIII'I~IIII • <br />999 ~ IATE OF <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dewnmenr o~ Natorai Resources <br />1 31 3 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 130318bb-]567 <br />Fax: 13031 83:-P ~ 06 <br />DAT&: November 18, 1994 <br />TO: Tom Gillis <br />FROM: Tom Schreiner <br />RE: Groundwater Hydrology Review -Incas Mine (110D) Amendment, <br />Permit No. M-86-076 <br />Foy Romer <br />Cm'ernor <br />Wmb 5 lochhe, d <br />Execui~ve OireOO. <br />A+iWel B. Lnns <br />o~x~:.nn oiraror <br />I have completed a hydrologic review of the amendment application for the Incas Mine <br />submitted to the Division on June 30, 1994. My recommendation is that we not approve the <br />amendment application at this time as there are serious deficiencies in baseline water <br />monitoring as well as ore characterization. I suggest that the operator and the Division meet <br />informally to discuss these issues and plan a course of action to satisfy the minimum <br />requirements of the Act. The outstanding concerns which must be adequately addressed <br />prior to approval are as follows: <br />1. A minimum of thru (3) baseline surface water samples from Little Deadwood Gulch <br />need to be collected and sent to a qualified laboratory for analysis. The lab should be <br />familiar with Colorado surface water standards and reporting procedures. <br />The results provided are inadequate because the detection limits presented are too <br />high, there is no measurement of hardness, and the metals values are not naported in <br />micrograms/liter. <br />A minimum of three (3) representative baseline ground water samples need to be <br />collected and sent to a qualified laboratory for analysis. No groundwater results have <br />been provided. This requirement is critical in order to determine ambient ground <br />water quality which may serve as the clean-up standard for spent ore leachate. If <br />groundwater in the vicinity has already been classified by the Water Quality Control <br />Commission, then appropriate standards defined by the WQCC will be used. <br />The Division will also apply a cleanup standard of 0.2 mg/1 wAD cyanide for all <br />detoxified process water and spent ore leachate: There should also be at least one (1) <br />representative groundwater sample collected each year to evaluate potential changes in <br />• a(s. re~.M~F+tnd f~ta~ sur{ece wafer in ~;ffl'e 4eadwood~lil~ti <br />.~,on;l~ored of ~easf ~karferY a~u.%n9 ~+;~ln~ w reeja»+Q~'a.. i., order fo <br />verl~`y Pr.~e~>ti~.. a~`~,Fr>tcc c,.dfet- ~~.a/,{y. <br />P.2~.3 <br />COLORADO <br />~~~v~~ ~~ <br />OFFIG~ ~~~~ <br />DEPARTMEI~R' OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.