My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93683
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:15:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:33:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/14/1990
Doc Name
TRANSMITTAL OF INSPECTION REPORTS NOV 7 1990 BOURG MINE C-81-021
From
MLRD
To
WALDEN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
SL2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department or Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SI.. Room 2t6 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fn%: 303 832 8706 <br />Roy Foner, <br />Governor <br />November 14, 1990 <br />Ms. Kay James <br />Walden Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 229 <br />Boulder, CO 80306 <br />III III III IIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />~F. ~~_~O <br />ti~/_- 9 <br />Fc<,p da j;0 <br />u <br />r ~iy~ <br />~ r876 ~ <br />Fretl R. Barra. <br />Division Duector <br />Re: Transmittal of Inspection Reports, November 7, 1990, Bourg Mine, C-81-021 <br />Dear Ms. James: <br />submittals to the Jackson County Courthouse to ensure the completeness of your <br />files there, <br />I am enclosing the Inspection Reports written as a consequence of the <br />November 7, 1990 inspection at the Bourg Mine. As a reminder, please send <br />copies of the 1990 Annual Reclamation Report, the 1990 Annual Hydrology <br />Report, the certificate of insurance and the last Bond Reduction request <br />I also noticed that the sign at the loadout had the previous phone number <br />listed. Please have the correct phone number put on the sign at both the mine <br />and the loadout. <br />Lastly, you asked if the bond would stay at the value agreed to in this <br />Bond Reduction Request until Phase II Bond Release occurred. I had answered <br />affirmatively, but after some thought on the subject it occurred to me that <br />the Division reviews bonds every 2 1/2 years, at the Midterm and at Permit <br />Renewal, and that conceivably your bond might increase at the Permit Renewal <br />if you had not gone through the Phase II Bond Release process by then. Our <br />current calculations have not been adjusted to reflect the higher fuel prices <br />which have developed since Iraq invaded Kuwait. I have enclosed a copy of <br />Susan's bond calculations for your review. <br />The following excerpt from Dan Mathews' minutes from the May 21, 1990, <br />Vegetation Task Force meeting as pertained to Vegetation Failure Bonding, <br />"Further, we concluded that no monetary release should be applied to <br />revegetation costs until an operator has demonstrated successful <br />establishment of cover, production, species diversity and woody plant <br />density, and the area in question has met the 10-year liability period <br />requirement. In other words, the total cost of revegetation should be <br />retained until complete success is demonstrated at the end of the <br />liability period. This approach would apply to bond readjustment as well <br />as phased bond releases, In essence, upon demonstrating compliance with <br />Phase II release criteria, bond funds tied up in topsoil replacement <br />could be released as long as the amount remaining is at least 15% of the <br />original bond amount. Bond funds associated with revegetation cost would <br />not be released at Phase II or in the context of a bond readjustment <br />prior to the end of the liability period, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.