Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiuiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51 , Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />f'Fhone' 0031 8h6-3567 <br />FA%.11031 R32-8106 <br />DATE: May 15, 1995 <br />TO: Wally Erickson <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Marr Mine, <br />(] <br />~~~~'-. <br />r`l0 Pit Stability <br />C-80-006) <br />II~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Goverrwr <br />lames S. Lochhead <br />Executive Dnecror <br />Michael B Lang <br />Div is~an Director <br />Analysis <br />Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the stability analysis <br />you forwarded to my attention, TerraMatrix, Inc. has back <br />calculated an angle of internal friction based upon the stable <br />overburden storage pile slope angle. Because it was stable, the <br />2:1 configuration of the storage pile had to have achieved a slope <br />stability factor of at least 1.0. Using that assumption, <br />TerraMatrix calculated a minimum angle of internal friction for the <br />overburden spoil of 26.0 degrees. This approach is acceptable <br />depending upon the degree of precision required for the final slope <br />stability evaluation. <br />Using the 26 degree angle of internal friction, a cohesion <br />intercept of zero, and an assumed phreatic surface 30 feet below <br />the surface at the head of the backfilled slope, TerraMatrix <br />calculated a static slope stability safety factor for the <br />backfilled Pit 720 slopes of 1.5. Each of these assumptions <br />appears to be relatively conservative. The required slope safety <br />factor for general backfilled slopes is 1.3. In my opinion this <br />approach is acceptable in this instance, in light of the <br />significant exceedence of the required threshold stability value. <br />I suspect, based upon my experience with sloping reclaimed pit <br />walls, that the cracking observed in late 1994 probably resulted <br />from consolidation of the backfilled spoil. In contrast to the <br />mechanical stability of the intact pit highwall, the consolidation <br />of the spoil results in differential cracking parallel to the <br />highwall. If no symptomatic evidence of rotational movement <br />exists, the movement is not due to slope failure. Simple <br />redressing and sealing of the cracks to avoid infiltration of <br />surface runoff will normally prevent the development of rotational <br />failure problems. <br />