My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91727
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91727
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:14 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:14:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980047
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/1983
Doc Name
MEMO-COLONY SHALE OIL PROJECT RESPONSE TO HYDROLOGIC MONITORING STIPULATION
From
MLR
To
JIM MCARDLE
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
999 <br />STATE OF COLORA00 Ri('~rnRn D. LA M1nd. ~a ro~:~~rv <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Esecutwe Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAA~IATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 7373 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 60203 Tel. (30~) $66-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />M11 E M 0 <br />T0: Jim McArdle <br /> <br />FROP~1: Jerry Zimpfer p~ ~ ~~.~e ~~~ <br />DATE: March 16, 1983 ,Pr"'~ ~h~>/ r <br />RE: Colony Shale Oil Project, Response to Hydrologic Monitoring Stipulation <br />I have completed my review of Exxon's proposed monitoring program for the <br />Colony Shale Oil Project received Plarch 3, 1983. The operator has provided <br />the information required by the hydrologic monitoring stipulation. The <br />response is, for the most part, satisfactory. Hov+ever, several minor concerns <br />have been identified. <br />The plan does not specifically include a downstream surface water <br />monitoring station on the Middle Fork of Parachute Creek. It is <br />important to have such a station downstream of the areas affected <br />by mining. If all surface flows are routed through Sediment Pond <br />No. 5, then the pond could be used as the downstream station. <br />However, the V-notch weir should be equipped with a continuous <br />recorder, and water quality should be monitored according to the <br />same constituents and at the same frequency as the other surface <br />water stations. <br />I have discussed the proposed list of water quality analyses with <br />Roy Cox. The list of constituents (surface water and alluvial <br />ground v+ater) should be modified slightly in order to better <br />monitor for the effects from dust suppressants. If magnesium <br />chloride is usedas a dust suppressant, both total and dissolved <br />magnesium should be monitored. If petroleum based products are <br />used as dust suppressants, the operator should analyze for Total <br />Organic Carbon. <br />In order to better account for the natural variations in water <br />quality, some water quality monitoring should occur more frequently <br />than the quarterly basis proposed. Field parameters such as electrical <br />conductivity, temperature, and pH should be measured on a monthly basis. <br />~P <br />/yt <br />cc: Jim Pendleton <br />Roy Cox <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.