My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91535
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91535
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:03 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:12:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/24/1996
Doc Name
REVIEW OF RESPONSES TO TR-29 PAR EAGLE MINES C-81-044
From
DMG
To
ERICA CROSBY
Type & Sequence
TR29
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III III III III IIII III <br /> 999 <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department o! Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 I~~~~ <br />Phone: 13071 866-3567 <br />FA%.1]031 8328106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br />~ <br />To: Erica Crosby Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br />From: Barbara P8Vllk lames S. LOChhead <br />Exec wive Dveaor <br /> Michael B. Long <br />Date: dIIIIe 24~ 1996 Division Director <br />Re: Review of Responses to TR-29 PAR <br />Eaqle Minea (C-81-0~4) <br />I have re-reviewed the above referenced responses in light of <br />information provided by you and have the following comments. This <br />memo supercedes that of June 11, 1996 <br />11) I was still not able to find where this question was <br />addressed in the responses. Please have the operator <br />indicate where it is addressed or provide a response if <br />it has not been addressed. <br />12) This comment has been adequately addressed. <br />13) This comment has been adequately addressed. <br />14) Except for well completion information, this comment has <br />been adequately addressed. Please have the operator <br />explain how they intend to prevent the refuse pile well <br />from silting in and thereby rendering the well useless. <br />The question arises, because the operator indicated in <br />his letter that both the CMP and PVC casing have holes <br />drilled in them to allow flow of water into the well. <br />Typically, a well completed in unconsolidated sediments <br />is completed with a well screen and filter pack designed <br />to minimize the entrance of sediment into the well. The <br />design of the well screen and filter pack is based on a <br />grain size analysis of the aquifer. The efficiency of <br />the well is further enhanced during the well development <br />process by pumping out sediment-laden water. What <br />development procedures, if any, were used in the <br />completion of this well? <br />15) The operator's argument supporting the prediction that <br />mine water will not discharge from the No. 9 Mine is <br />insufficient. Although the piezometric surface in the <br />aquifer below the mined seam is lower than the portal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.