My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91258
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:50 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/24/1993
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW TR 66 WEST ELK MINE FN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MTN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
TR66
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nalu ral Resources ~~oF~co~~ <br />Ns <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (303 866-3567 ~ • /evc • <br />FAX: 1303) 832-8106 <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />November 24, 1993 Division D~rectar <br />Ms. Kathleen Welt <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />RE: Adequacy Review; Technical Revision No. 66; West Elk Mine; <br />File No. C-80-007 <br />Dear Ms. Welt; <br />The Division has reviewed Mountain Coal Company's response to our <br />adequacy review of your application for Technical Revision No. 66, <br />which proposes a minor reconfiguration of the west facing slope of <br />the refuse pile in order to repair a slump and buttress the spring <br />which initiated the slump. The Division has the following <br />additional concerns: <br />1. As drawing 2.oA, Proposed Landslide Remediation, will be <br />inserted into Exhibit 51, MCC should provide an updated <br />table of contents for this exhibit. <br />The Division finds the schedule to monitor the new survey <br />monuments on a quarterly basis acceptable. The results <br />of the survey should be submitted along with the survey <br />results for the north face monuments. The Division would <br />recommend the surveys begin during the first quarter of <br />1994. <br />The Division continues to believe the installation of a <br />piezometer is appropriate. If properly installed, the <br />piezometer should not allow the communication of fluid <br />pressure. A properly installed piezometer, like a <br />monitoring well, should be isolated to contact only the <br />zone of interest. In this case the piezometer should be <br />installed perhaps five feet outside the gravel french <br />drain to determine whether the refuse is saturated above <br />the elevation of the french drain, which the french drain <br />is intended to prevent. The piezometer should be cased <br />with plastic pipe, perforated for the lowermost five <br />feet, and then gravel packed through the perforated <br />interval. Finally, it should be sealed with bentonite to <br />prevent the communication of fluids. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.