My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90872
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:31 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/17/1997
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE MR04 PORTAL CUT LANDSLIDE REPAIR PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
JOE DUDASH
Type & Sequence
MR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • iii iiiiiiiiniiiiii~ <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORP~UU <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanment of Natural Rewurces <br />1713 Sherman 51., Roam 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1703) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 832-8106 <br />DATE: October 17, 1997 <br />TO: Joe Dudash <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />,,~ <br />7 <br />/~ <br />RE: Bowie Mine - .R. 04 -Portal Cut Landslide Repair <br />(Perini : C-96-083) <br />I have reviewed the supplemental responses submitted by Bowie Resources Limited (BRL), <br />which you forwazded to my attention. These submittals respond to your eazlier incompleteness <br />letter regazding BRL's original submittal of M.R. 04. <br />~~. <br />,~ <br />~r <br />DEPAIiTMEfJT OF <br />NATURAL . <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />fames 5. Lochhead <br />Execwive Director <br />Michael B Long <br />Division Dlrecror <br />BRL has subritted a stability analysis prepazed by MAXIM, Inc., geotechnica] consultant. <br />MAXIM's analysis is based upon material strength parameters reviewed and accepted by the <br />Division as a portion of the original permit application. They do appear appropriate for this <br />analysis. The analysis projects that the final configuration, including a backfilled upper cutslope <br />at 1.75h: l v, and a backfilled lower slope (above the multi plate tubes) of 2h:1 v, will have a static <br />slope safety factor of between 1.5 and 1.8 I recommend acceptance of MAXIM's analysis and <br />approval of the modified plan. <br />The failure, as J.E. Stover and Associates postulates, probably occurred because BRL had grossly <br />over steepened the portal bench cutslope while driving the initial portal entries. Hopefully, BRL <br />will succeed in completing [he three portal face up, installation of the multi plate tubes, and <br />backfilling above the tubes to the approved configuration. <br />I believe it would be appropriate to require BRL to monitor the success of its repair, as a <br />condition of approval of M.R. 04. I recommend that BRL be directed to install two <br />perpendicular ("X") lines of metal fence posts on the backfilled slope to allow visual monitoring <br />of the stability of the final configuration. This should also provide visual warning to the <br />operational personnel entering the portals. <br />In consideration of MAXIM, Inc.'s demonstration, 1 do not believe your proposed DRAFT' <br />stipulation to be necessary as a portion of the Division's approval of M.R. 04. <br />cc: <br />Dave Berry <br />doc: M:\CoaIUAP\BRLMR04.WPD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.